Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #15 – March 23, 2026, 01:59:52 pm Quote from: kruddler – on March 23, 2026, 01:42:58 pmQuote from: crashlander – on March 23, 2026, 10:42:54 am Pitto in 3rd says something.I wonder if TDK is 3rd in the saints count at this stage?Or even in the top 10! Probably not, although he was decent enough against GWS.This will be the test for Pitto: if he can keep Gawn from dominating, we should be OK. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #16 – March 23, 2026, 02:54:26 pm Quote from: kruddler – on March 23, 2026, 01:42:58 pmQuote from: crashlander – on March 23, 2026, 10:42:54 am Pitto in 3rd says something.I wonder if TDK is 3rd in the saints count at this stage?Or even in the top 10! He probably will be, will get a pass because the rest of the team is more why they lost than him. Gawn did play better than him, but he put in a shift at least, just not one worth 1.8 million worth. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #17 – March 23, 2026, 04:08:02 pm I had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their systemNothing against Melbourneand only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the same Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #18 – March 23, 2026, 04:27:13 pm Quote from: Lods – on March 23, 2026, 04:08:02 pmI had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their systemNothing against Melbourneand only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the sameSo, basically 1 game gets you top 4-5 after 3 games??Wow, they are worse than i thought. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #19 – March 23, 2026, 05:09:26 pm Quote from: kruddler – on March 23, 2026, 04:27:13 pmQuote from: Lods – on March 23, 2026, 04:08:02 pmI had a look at the Saintsational voting for the games so far.Tom had the second most votes in the Collingwood game-45 under their systemNothing against Melbourneand only a handful against GWS to this stage, but they haven't finished voting yet.But that first game gained him enough that he's probably in the top 4-5 at the moment on their voting.Hall, Sinclair and Wilkie are ahead of him, Windhager and NWM around the sameSo, basically 1 game gets you top 4-5 after 3 games??Wow, they are worse than i thought.It's a bit like percentageA big win in the first three rounds and a couple of close results, gives you an unrealistic percentage.As the year goes on and more games are played it evens itself out and it's the consistent performers who end up at the top. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #20 – April 02, 2026, 10:14:46 pm AFL 2026 Rd 2: Carlton vs MelbourneI've left the voting thread open, as this is a short week. I'd rather not have to change things, but I will if necessary. I want more people voting, even in disasters like this one.Trends:[1] There were 10 voters this round, which isn't too bad considering how poor we were after half time. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night![2] The rating was a 6.13, which represents a E+, shows juts how frustrated our voters are this week.[3] 15 players managed a mention this week, which is better than last week. But the size of the vote shows how few played 4 quarters.[4] The average vote this week was 20, which again shows significant dissatisfaction with the result and the effort after half time. [5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week. This is the best for the year, but the size shows that our players weren't dominant for 4 quarters.[6] Sam Walsh and Jacob Weitering were both BOG's this round with 175 votes. They were followed by Mitch McGovern with 163 and Elijah Hollands with 113. [7] Three player managed votes from everyone this week, Walsh, McGovern and Weitering. Elijah Hollands missed from 1.[8] The distribution of votes this week suggested that we had a rounded performance across the board; everyone fell off after half time.[9] If there was a positive from this disaster, it was the significant contribution from our youngsters. Smith, Dean, Byrne and the Hollands brothers made contributions.Votes:Walsh, Sam 175Weitering, Jacob 175McGovern, Mitchell 163Hollands, Elijah 113Young, Lewis 52Hollands, Oliver 40Cripps, Patrick 37Smith, Jagga 34Byrne, Talor 34Ainsworth, Ben 31Carroll, Matthew 28Dean, Harry 12Pittonet, Marc 9William, Zac 9McKay, Harrison 9Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 700Smith, Jagga 394Pittonet, Marc 316Weitering, Jacob 308Patrick Cripps 228Mitch McGovern 199Lord, Cooper 144 Hollands, Elijah 124William, Zac 118Matthew Carroll 97Ainsworth, Ben 65Hollands. Ollie 62Young, Lewis 55Florent, Oliver 53Hewett, George 52Dean, Harry 51Byrne, Talor 34Harry McKay 23Kemp, Brodie 10Will Hayward 8Sam Walsh is the early leader, ahead of Jagga Smith. Pitto in 3rd says something. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #21 – April 13, 2026, 12:00:00 pm AFL 2026 Rd 4: Carlton vs North MelbourneI've left the voting thread open for longer, because of the short week. But, losing turns voters off.Trends:[1] There were 9 voters this round, which is not good. But then, it is hard to vote when we do so poorly and when the program is so disjointed and unsatisfactory. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night![2] The rating was a 6.93, which represents a D, shows just how frustrated our voters are this week.[3] 17 players managed a mention this week, which is better than last week. But the size of the vote shows how few played 4 quarters. Hard, I guess, when the whole team doesn't play 4 quarters![4] The average vote this week was 23, which again shows significant dissatisfaction with the result and the effort after half time. Scores are around 30 when we win.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more this week, which equals last week's effort. [6] Elijah Hollands was both BOG this round with 258 votes. He was followed by Pittonet, McGovern and Ollie Hollands.[7] One player managed votes from everyone this week, Elijah Hollands. None of the others got close.[8] The distribution of votes this week suggested that we had a rounded performance across the board; everyone fell off after half time.[9] The Hollands brothers dominated. But most of our youngsters didn't make the contribution they've done in earlier games.Votes:Hollands, Elijah 258Pittonet, Marc 162McGovern, Mitchell 142Hollands, Oliver 104Kemp, Brodie 69Newman, Nicholas 58Ainsworth, Ben 50Walsh, Sam 31Weitering, Jacob 31Cripps, Patrick 31Boyd, Jordan 27Hewett, George 23Cowan, Lachlan 23Cerra, Adam 12Florent, Oliver 8Evans, Francis 8Smith, Jagga 4Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 731Pittonet, Marc 477Smith, Jagga 398Hollands, Elijah 382Mitch McGovern 341Weitering, Jacob 339Patrick Cripps 259Hollands. Ollie 166Lord, Cooper 144 William, Zac 118Ainsworth, Ben 115Matthew Carroll 97Kemp, Brodie 90Hewett, George 75Florent, Oliver 61Young, Lewis 55Newman, Nic 58Dean, Harry 51Byrne, Talor 34Boyd, Jordan 27Harry McKay 23Cowan, Lachie 24Cerra, Adam 12Will Hayward 8Evans, Francis 8Sam Walsh is the early leader, ahead of Marc Pottonet! Considering that we haven't really won the ruck much, that says a lot. Jagga Smith is 3rd. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #22 – April 19, 2026, 12:20:01 pm AFL 2026 Rd 5: Carlton vs AdelaideI've left the voting thread open for longer, because of the short week. But, losing turns voters off, and another fail hurts.Trends:[1] There were 10 voters this round, which is a considerable fall off from our opening game. Nichevo. When we lose, it is difficult to get voters to care enough to vote, especially when we don't show that we've learnt anything from those losses. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night![2] The rating was a 7.33, which represents a D+, shows just how frustrated our voters are this week. Considering that the rating was our 2nd best for the year just shows how dissatisfied we've become.[3] 17 players managed a mention again this week. Clearly, almost everyone of doing something, enough to get noticed, just not enough to get us over the line. [4] The average vote this week was 24, which is also our 2nd best for the year. Scores are around 30 when we win, so read into that what you will.[5] For the second week in a row 4 players managed 100 votes or more. But... [6] Sam Walsh was BOG for the 3rd time this season with 246 votes. He was followed by Pittonet, Cripps and Haynes.[7] Two players managed votes from everyone this week, Cripps and Walsh. Pittonet missed from one voter.[8] It was hard to determine a trend among the vote getters this week, as so many of our players did something. However, 3 of our midfield players were among our top 4, so I'll say that our mids were our best division.[9] The Hollands brothers and Matt Carroll were probably our most effective youngsters on the night. What a sad reflection that is at the moment, especially with a cloud now firmly over Elijah's future.Votes:Walsh, Sam 246Cripps, Patrick 187Pittonet, Marc 165Haynes, Nicholas 114Carroll, Matthew 95Hollands, Oliver 66Hollands, Elijah 44McGovern, Mitchell 44Newman, Nicholas 33Ainsworth, Ben 33Florent, Oliver 33Young, Lewis 15Evans, Francis 7McKay, Harrison 7Cerra, Adam 4Smith, Jagga 4William, Zac 4Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 977Pittonet, Marc 642Patrick Cripps 446Hollands, Elijah 426Smith, Jagga 401Mitch McGovern 385Weitering, Jacob 339Hollands. Ollie 232Matthew Carroll 193Ainsworth, Ben 148Lord, Cooper 144 William, Zac 122Haynes, Nick 114Florent, Oliver 94Newman, Nic 91Kemp, Brodie 90Hewett, George 75Young, Lewis 69Dean, Harry 51Byrne, Talor 34Harry McKay 30Boyd, Jordan 27Cowan, Lachie 24Evans, Francis 16Cerra, Adam 16Will Hayward 8Sam Walsh is the early leader, ahead of Marc Pittonet! Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #23 – April 28, 2026, 10:38:53 am AFL 2026 Rd 6: Carlton vs CollingwoodI've left the voting thread open for longer, because of the short week. But, losing turns voters off, and another fail hurts. Especially as we managed to grab defeat from the jaws of victory yet again.Trends:[1] There were 10 voters this round, which is the same as last round. Nichevo. When we lose, it is difficult to get voters to care enough to vote, especially when we don't show that we've learnt anything from those losses. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night![2] The rating was a 7.7, which represents a C-, is the best we've managed for the year and we still lost. Our rating of the Richmond game, our only win, was 7.69.[3] 18 players managed a mention again this week. Clearly, almost everyone of doing something, enough to get noticed, just not enough to get us over the line. [4] The average vote this week was 25, which is also our equal best of the year. Scores are around 30 when we win, so read into that what you will.[5] 5 players managed 100 votes or more. That is excellent, I don't think we've managed better. [6] Sam Walsh was BOG for the 4th time this season with 196 votes. He was followed by Carroll, Florent, Newman and Williams.[7] No player managed votes from everyone this week, This is another thing without Precedence and shows why we aren't winning.[8] It was hard to determine a trend among the vote getters this week, as so many of our players did something. [9] Matt Carroll was probably our most effective youngsters on the night. Votes:Walsh, Sam 196Florent, Oliver 146Carroll, Matthew 135Newman, Nicholas 127William, Zac 127Hayward, Will 85McGovern, Mitchell 73Pittonet, Marc 54Ainsworth, Ben 54Cripps, Patrick 35McKay, Harrison 35Weitering, Jacob 23Cowan, Lachlan 23Young, Lewis 12Haynes, Nicholas 8Evans, Francis 8Smith, Jagga 8Kemp, Brodie 8Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 1173Pittonet, Marc 696Patrick Cripps 481Mitch McGovern 458Hollands, Elijah 426Smith, Jagga 409Weitering, Jacob 362Matthew Carroll 327William, Zac 249Florent, Oliver 240Hollands. Ollie 232Newman, Nic 218Ainsworth, Ben 202Lord, Cooper 144 Haynes, Nick 122Will Hayward 93Kemp, Brodie 87Young, Lewis 81Hewett, George 75Harry McKay 64Dean, Harry 51Cowan, Lachie 47Byrne, Talor 34Boyd, Jordan 27Evans, Francis 23Cerra, Adam 16Looking at the voting and a number of things really stand out:[1] Sam Walsh has easily been our best player so far this year, yet he hasn't really been as good as he can be. And he is our most effective mid by far.[2] The rest of our midfield has really struggled to make an impact. Pittonet is 2nd, yet he has struggled to dominate opponents. Cripps is usually over a 100 votes by the this time, yet he is not half that. Cerra barely rates a mention. George is little better.[3] Jagga Smith is 6th, and he has struggled to make the same impact that he did to start the year.[4] Other than Marc Pittonet, few players have improved their scores. Elijah Hollands was good, but his career is now under a cloud. Matt Carroll is making a much bigger contribution, as had Mitch McGovern. And that's about it.[5] Some of our senior players are not even on the list. Saad, Acres and Cottrell don't have a vote. George and Adam Cerra barely have any. H, our key forward, hasn't even managed 100 votes yet.[6] Our replacements for de Koning, Silvagni and Curnow have struggled to make much of an impact. Ainsworth has been the pick of them, with 202 votes. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #24 – May 07, 2026, 09:37:23 pm AFL 2026 Rd 7: Carlton vs FremantleI've left the voting thread open for longer, because of the short week. But, losing turns voters off, and another fail hurts. Especially as we managed to grab defeat from the jaws of victory yet again. I hate writing this ...Trends:[1] There were 10 voters this round, which is the same as last 2 rounds. Nichevo. When we lose, it is difficult to get voters to care enough to vote, especially when we don't show that we've learnt anything from those losses. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night![2] The rating was a 7.77, which represents a C-, is the best we've managed for the year and we still lost. Our rating of the Richmond game, our only win, was 7.69 which says far too much.[3] 13 players managed a mention this week. Clearly, most of our players are doing something, enough to get noticed, just not enough to get us over the line. [4] The average vote this week was 25, which is also our equal best of the year. Scores are around 30 when we win, so read into that what you will.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more. This is becoming the norm, which is something I like. [6] Sam Walsh was BOG for the 5th time this season with 287 votes. He was followed by Kemp, Carroll and Cripps.[7] Two player managed votes from everyone this week. This tells us that the same players were being seen as making a significant contribution.[8] Our mids were probably our strongest group this week, but we were still beaten there. [9] Matt Carroll was probably our most effective youngsters on the night for the 2nd week in a row. Votes:Walsh, Sam 287Kemp, Brodie 210Carroll, Matthew 175Cripps, Patrick 151Haynes, Nicholas 78McGovern, Mitchell 74Newman, Nicholas 54William, Zac 54Hayward, Will 31Reidy, Liam 21Smith, Jagga 12Lord, Cooper 8Weitering, Jacob 4A lot of our important players are not scoring well.Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 1461Pittonet, Marc 696Patrick Cripps 632Mitch McGovern 532Matthew Carroll 502Hollands, Elijah 426Smith, Jagga 421Weitering, Jacob 366William, Zac 303Kemp, Brodie 297Newman, Nic 273Florent, Oliver 240Hollands. Ollie 232Ainsworth, Ben 202Haynes, Nick 200Lord, Cooper 152Will Hayward 124Young, Lewis 81Hewett, George 75Harry McKay 64Dean, Harry 51Cowan, Lachie 47Byrne, Talor 34Liam Reidy 28Boyd, Jordan 27Evans, Francis 23Cerra, Adam 16H having 64 shows just how out of sorts he is. Considering that he is our key forward, that really shows our dysfunctional our forward line is.Similarly, look at Weitering's score. When he is playing well, he'd be a 1000 by now. Quote Selected
Re: Jim Park Award 2026 Reply #25 – Today at 10:21:02 am AFL 2026 Rd 8: Carlton vs St. KildaI left voting open for longer again after this disaster. I can understand why people don't want to vote: we were diabolical after half time after a really positive start. I don't think I've ever felt our side to be so heartless.Trends:[1] There were 10 voters this round, which is the same as last 3 rounds. Nichevo. When we lose, it is difficult to get voters to care enough to vote, especially when we don't show that we've learnt anything from those losses. Please do voteplease do vote, win, lose or draw: it is something we appreciate and it makes our statistics a lot more reliable. And our statistics hold up pretty well when it comes to John Nicholls Medal night!Just something to note: in the corresponding round last only 7 people voted, which is about as low as I can remember. We must have been better this time, but somehow I can't see it.[2] The rating was a 5.90, which represents a E, is the worst we've managed for the year, which really tells you how much this one hurt. Our rating of the Richmond game, our only win, was 7.69 which says far too much.[3] 13 players managed a mention this week. Clearly, most of our players are doing something, enough to get noticed, probably in the first half. [4] The average vote this week was 19, which is the worst result of the year. Scores are around 30 when we win, so read into that what you will. Scores in the high 20's represent an honourable loss. This wasn't close to either.[5] 4 players managed 100 votes or more. This is becoming the norm, which is something I like. But it does suggest that too many others didn't do much at all.[6] Ollie Florent was BOG for the 1st time this season with 207 votes. He was followed by Kemp, Ainsworth and Newman.[7] Three player managed votes from everyone this week, Florent, Kemp and Newman. [8] We had 2 recruits show the way this round, in Ainsworth and Florent. [9] Matt Carroll was probably our most effective youngsters on the night for the 3rd week in a row. Votes:Oliver Florent 207Kemp, Brodie 183Newman, Nicholas 168Ainsworth, Ben 148Haynes, Nicholas 47Walsh, Sam 38Carroll, Matthew 38William, Zac 18Saad, Adam 15Smith, Jagga 9Hollands, Oliver 9Evans, Francis 3Cerra, Adam 3A lot of our important players are not scoring well.And it was clear that our 4 best stood out, as there was much after them at all.Progressive Voting:Walsh, Sam 1499Pittonet, Marc 696Patrick Cripps 632Matthew Carroll 540Mitch McGovern 532Kemp, Brodie 480Florent, Oliver 447Newman, Nic 441Smith, Jagga 430Hollands, Elijah 426Weitering, Jacob 366Ainsworth, Ben 350William, Zac 321Haynes, Nick 247Hollands. Ollie 241Lord, Cooper 152Will Hayward 124Young, Lewis 81Hewett, George 75Harry McKay 64Dean, Harry 51Cowan, Lachie 47Byrne, Talor 34Liam Reidy 28Boyd, Jordan 27Evans, Francis 26Cerra, Adam 19Adam Saad 15Usually we have 2 or 3 guys over 1000 at this point. This year, we have but one, Walsh. Quote Selected
Topic: Jim Park Award 2026 (Read 33355 times)
previous topic - next topic
Topic: Jim Park Award 2026 (Read 33355 times)
previous topic - next topic