Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Topic: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle (Read 8507 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

July 18, 2015, 10:44:29 pm

Lost another one. I don't like the score, but I have no idea what happened.

Remember:
[1] At least 3 players need to get a mention.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player.
[3] Give a rating of team performance. It can be anywhere from A+ to F.
[4] Votes must add up to 15.

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #1 – July 19, 2015, 06:25:11 am

5 Buckley

4 Curnow

3 White

2 Bell

1 Kreuzer

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #2 – July 19, 2015, 07:31:28 pm

5 bucks
4 doc
3 Kruezer
2 curnow
1 murph

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #3 – July 19, 2015, 08:20:21 pm

Team E

5: Buckley
5: White
4: Docherty
1: Kruezer

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #4 – July 19, 2015, 10:37:46 pm

White 5
Buckley 3
Kruez 2
Docherty 2
Bell 1
Murphy 1
Cripps 1

Team C

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #5 – July 20, 2015, 12:08:30 am

Team = C

Buckley 3
Docherty 3
White 3
Bell 2
Murphy 2
Tutt 1
Simpson 1

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #6 – July 20, 2015, 12:20:07 am

Team D

5 - Buckley
4 - Docherty
3 - White
2 - Kreuzer
1 - Bell

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #7 – July 20, 2015, 10:04:14 am

Same names every week, what an indictment on the group.

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #8 – July 20, 2015, 11:20:23 am

Pretty sure Buckley, Docherty and White weren't dominating last week and isn't this a votes only thread?

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #9 – July 20, 2015, 12:23:02 pm

Quote from: PassIt2Carrots on July 20, 2015, 11:20:23 am

Pretty sure Buckley, Docherty and White weren't dominating last week and isn't this a votes only thread?

Mainly. The arguments are supposed to be on the post game threads and the like. But comments do appear: I am the worst offender. But I feel I always need to explain my thinking. I don't mind if others justify their thoughts, but it does make things more difficult to correlate when you have to wade through a heap of arguments.

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #10 – July 20, 2015, 12:50:38 pm

Team - D

5 - White
4 - Buckley
3 - Docherty
2 - Curnow
1 - Bell

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #11 – July 20, 2015, 05:54:55 pm

Quote from: crashlander on July 20, 2015, 12:23:02 pm

Mainly. The arguments are supposed to be on the post game threads and the like. But comments do appear: I am the worst offender. But I feel I always need to explain my thinking. I don't mind if others justify their thoughts, but it does make things more difficult to correlate when you have to wade through a heap of arguments.

I think the comments alongside the votes are fine, more questioning the votes of others.

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #12 – July 20, 2015, 06:52:35 pm

Quote from: PassIt2Carrots on July 20, 2015, 05:54:55 pm

I think the comments alongside the votes are fine, more questioning the votes of others.

Isn't the Prof questioning the performance of those players that don't score votes rather than the performance of voters?

I'm still thinking about my votes. Using the 5 4 3 2 1 system does throw up some issues

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #13 – July 20, 2015, 09:55:35 pm

Team: D

5 - Curnow
4 - Murphy
3 - Bell
2 - White
1 - Docherty

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #14 – July 21, 2015, 11:29:40 am

Quote from: DJC on July 20, 2015, 06:52:35 pm

Isn't the Prof questioning the performance of those players that don't score votes rather than the performance of voters?

I'm still thinking about my votes. Using the 5 4 3 2 1 system does throw up some issues

The 5 4 3 2 1 voting system is the easiest for my to enter, but I find that it doesn't give me an opportunity to give votes to as many players who may deserve a mention or to grade them sufficiently. But I am the extreme case. Others follow it rigidly: the other extreme.
I don't care as long as the votes add up.