My obvious question: are we going to allow Daicos, Sidebottom, etc, to run around with nobody near them?
I'd be tempted to have Wilson play a negative role on Nick Daicos. But will our match committee use their brains?
It may not, but Wilson isn't slow. Staying with him wouldn't be the issue
It would be a huge ask in his first game for the year.
I see him as more an attacking defender.
He has the pace...match fitness and defensive ability may be an issue.
Daicos would take him where the ball is though
It would be a huge ask in his first game for the year.
I see him as more an attacking defender.
He has the pace...match fitness and defensive ability may be an issue.
Daicos would take him where the ball is though
My obvious question: are we going to allow Daicos, Sidebottom, etc, to run around with nobody near them?
I'd be tempted to have Wilson play a negative role on Nick Daicos. But will our match committee use their brains?
Cripps off the ground MAY actually be an issue, however its not for the reason being highlighted.If there was a tactical decision to give Cripps more bench time, it was bloody stupid to omit Hewitt - especially under the prevailing weather conditions.
IMO, Cripps off the ground is as much about missing his leadership/direction as it is his actual skills.
He would help with telling people where to be, when to go, when to stay. If he's not there, that might not be getting done as required, hence a run on. Potentially a system breakdown by a group that is still learning each other and the game plan due to high changeover.
Cripps off the ground MAY actually be an issue, however its not for the reason being highlighted.
IMO, Cripps off the ground is as much about missing his leadership/direction as it is his actual skills.
He would help with telling people where to be, when to go, when to stay. If he's not there, that might not be getting done as required, hence a run on. Potentially a system breakdown by a group that is still learning each other and the game plan due to high changeover.