Skip to main content
Topic: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications (Read 30885 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #240
Yep.
I see that tall Durds has been given another contract and was an emergency for one of our finals... reckon he and Young will be competing for the same spot during pre season training.
Hopefully one or even both stand up and be noticed. I made mention of Motlop and Fogarty having disappointing games, but we were killed in the clearances and this was a big reason why they got back into the game, the two lacked opportunities to impact. Obviously Daniher and Hipwood were given too many opportunities for our gun Weitering to deal with. 

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #241
Reckon tall Durds is like that fire extinguisher you have at home or work you walk past everyday and hope you never have to use....for me he is there to replace one player only in the main and thats Jacob Weitering.
You're probably right Elwood, in any case it's still very important, no matter what the form of him or Young, to have these guys on the list, for the purpose that was badly missing for a lot of the year and what exposed us against Brisbane. We will be too far into the draft to get a developing tall KPD imo, hence tall Durdin is on our list as an insurance policy.


Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #242
I’m not sure that Pitto and the King would be selected ahead of Cox and Cameron but Collingwood won the premiership with two genuine, lumbering rucks and two key forwards.  Admittedly, one of the key forwards was a bit of a decoy because their first choice KPF was injured.

Of course, both of Collingwood’s rucks are a threat when they go forward.  Neither managed a goal in the GF, but they demand a decent defender.

The idea that we’re unbalanced with two rucks and two tall forwards doesn’t stack up, particularly since the alternative is two tall forwards, one ruck and a third tall forward/undersized ruck.

That’s not to say that Brisbane model - one outstanding ruckman backed up by one of their two tall forwards - isn’t effective.  It worked quite well against us, but there were other factors at play.  However, it wasn’t effective against Collingwood.

I don’t understand the reasoning behind some of our team selections but I do understand that the reasoning behind those decisions is based on more and much better information than I have, as well as far superior footy understanding and knowledge.  Games of footy aren’t lost by the MC.  They’re lost because the players aren’t good enough or they’re not at their best, or the gameplan is flawed or not executed well enough.

Flags have been won in many different ways. 2017 Richmond won with one key forward and a small forward line, then in 2019 they won with Lynch, Riewoldt, Nankervis and Soldo. 2020 they did it with one ruck and a pinch-hitter. 2018 the Eagles won with Vardy, Lycett, Kennedy and Darling, Melbourne won with Gawn, Jackson, McDonald and Brown, 2022, Jackson was very proficient forward. 2022 Geelong went with Stanley, a part-timer ruck in Blicavs and as well as Hawkins and Cameron. Looks like you can win it with many different combinations.

If you go in with an one extra tall, or one extra small probably it isn't going to make alot of difference. Most important thing to me is that at least one ruck can play well around the ground and go forward and kick a goal. Can't have two centre bounce rucks that can't do anything else. That's where you come unbalanced, like essentially being like a player down. If you have one that can take marks around the ground and kick a goal, great, play 2 rucks. If you have just 2 plain centre bounce rucks that can't do much else then you need to pick a pinch hitter. It's why Levi, for all his faults is a very handy footballer. Luke Jackson probably a better version.

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #243
Flags have been won in many different ways. 2017 Richmond won with one key forward and a small forward line, then in 2019 they won with Lynch, Riewoldt, Nankervis and Soldo. 2020 they did it with one ruck and a pinch-hitter. 2018 the Eagles won with Vardy, Lycett, Kennedy and Darling, Melbourne won with Gawn, Jackson, McDonald and Brown, 2022, Jackson was very proficient forward. 2022 Geelong went with Stanley, a part-timer ruck in Blicavs and as well as Hawkins and Cameron. Looks like you can win it with many different combinations.

If you go in with an one extra tall, or one extra small probably it isn't going to make alot of difference. Most important thing to me is that at least one ruck can play well around the ground and go forward and kick a goal. Can't have two centre bounce rucks that can't do anything else. That's where you come unbalanced, like essentially being like a player down. If you have one that can take marks around the ground and kick a goal, great, play 2 rucks. If you have just 2 plain centre bounce rucks that can't do much else then you need to pick a pinch hitter. It's why Levi, for all his faults is a very handy footballer. Luke Jackson probably a better version.

I said it before.

In a grand final like the one we saw, Jarrod Berry's 2 50 metre penalty brain fades had more to do with the result than any other factor.

Even so, had Bailey not played advantage in that last minute and a half of bedlam, and Brisbane kicked another goal the result flips, we talk about a brisbane premiership, and how Collingwoods decision to play Billy Frampton as a purely defensive forward cost them the game.

Or, Nathan Murphy's concussion becomes the difference.

The match was won and lost in so many little moments of people switching off at the wrong time, that team balance being "the reason" is completely irrelevant.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #244
The match was won and lost in so many little moments of people switching off at the wrong time, that team balance being "the reason" is completely irrelevant.
In fairness MC can have an impact, if we go back to the Prelim and watch for those little moments, when Martin and Motlop fly and we've nobody crumbing, where was Owies and Cunningham at the fall of the ball?

That's a type of team balance issue, but it's not the only reason for falling at the hurdle.

Retrospectively we can never know definitively if what the MC's did were positives or negatives, all we have are the vents on the day and a bunch of what could have been observations.
The Force Awakens!

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #245
Managing moments is all the rage with coaches at the moment. I try and watch as many press conferences as I can, and I can't recall a coach saying they lost because they lacked balance. Undoubtedly there are competing parameters that need to be complimentary in some fashion (tall v small, size and strength v pace, endurance v burst power, extractor v distributor etc.), but I'd guess it's one ball among many that coaches need to juggle.

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #246
Flags have been won in many different ways. 2017 Richmond won with one key forward and a small forward line, then in 2019 they won with Lynch, Riewoldt, Nankervis and Soldo. 2020 they did it with one ruck and a pinch-hitter. 2018 the Eagles won with Vardy, Lycett, Kennedy and Darling, Melbourne won with Gawn, Jackson, McDonald and Brown, 2022, Jackson was very proficient forward. 2022 Geelong went with Stanley, a part-timer ruck in Blicavs and as well as Hawkins and Cameron. Looks like you can win it with many different combinations.

If you go in with an one extra tall, or one extra small probably it isn't going to make alot of difference. Most important thing to me is that at least one ruck can play well around the ground and go forward and kick a goal. Can't have two centre bounce rucks that can't do anything else. That's where you come unbalanced, like essentially being like a player down. If you have one that can take marks around the ground and kick a goal, great, play 2 rucks. If you have just 2 plain centre bounce rucks that can't do much else then you need to pick a pinch hitter. It's why Levi, for all his faults is a very handy footballer. Luke Jackson probably a better version.

Yes, there's no hard and fast rule about ruck/forward combinations, but your point about not going with two one-dimensional rucks is pretty close to being a rule.  I guess the same could be said about going with two very good around the ground rucks when neither can play the support/tall forward role.

Pitto and the King, when they're on, make a formidable combination.  They weren't really on against McInerney but Cox and Cameron were on in the GF and limited McInerney's influence.

Levi will be preparing for his third season since we announced his retirement  ::) 
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #247
Flags have been won in many different ways. 2017 Richmond won with one key forward and a small forward line, then in 2019 they won with Lynch, Riewoldt, Nankervis and Soldo. 2020 they did it with one ruck and a pinch-hitter. 2018 the Eagles won with Vardy, Lycett, Kennedy and Darling, Melbourne won with Gawn, Jackson, McDonald and Brown, 2022, Jackson was very proficient forward. 2022 Geelong went with Stanley, a part-timer ruck in Blicavs and as well as Hawkins and Cameron. Looks like you can win it with many different combinations.
Across that timeframe the rules have changed multiple times, as has the way the umpires are directed to interpret them!

A good example is after our game against the Handbaggers early this season, Scott bitched and moaned about his poor poor injured ruck and damaged Mid being beaten up by the high jumping TDK raising his knee and not being penalised. In the following weeks, TDK was almost umpired out of the game, something we should have been whispering in SDKs ear as a reminder about the behaviour of his coach! It was Scott's choice to play an injured/recovering ruck and his premier midfielder in the ruck, why should anyone else be penalised. He put Blicavs and Stanley to the sword to save Cameron, Hawkins and others.

No official rule was changed, but the way the game was played and umpired changed after that weekend! ;)

We'd get no sympathy if we stupidly played Harry or Cripps in the ruck and a Nankervis or Darcy type smashed them up, yet that is what some fans want! To me it's stupidity to put premium players at greater physical risk, and worse still to toy with their form by playing them out of position just to create a spot for some other piecewise players.

That sort of thing makes it very hard to compare seasons and tactics but it does tell us one thing, and that is anyone who thinks they have the right way or the only solution is surely kidding themselves!
The Force Awakens!

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #248
I said it before.

In a grand final like the one we saw, Jarrod Berry's 2 50 metre penalty brain fades had more to do with the result than any other factor.

Even so, had Bailey not played advantage in that last minute and a half of bedlam, and Brisbane kicked another goal the result flips, we talk about a brisbane premiership, and how Collingwoods decision to play Billy Frampton as a purely defensive forward cost them the game.

Or, Nathan Murphy's concussion becomes the difference.

The match was won and lost in so many little moments of people switching off at the wrong time, that team balance being "the reason" is completely irrelevant.

Yes, Bonehead Berry's brain fade was as costly as it get. Can even go back to the QF and Maynard's hit on Brayshaw cost Melbourne the game. If it wasn't for the hit putting Brayshaw out of the game the Pies may well have been out week 2.

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #249
Yes, Bonehead Berry's brain fade was as costly as it get. Can even go back to the QF and Maynard's hit on Brayshaw cost Melbourne the game. If it wasn't for the hit putting Brayshaw out of the game the Pies may well have been out week 2.
Let's not forget the impact of the umpiring non-decisions that robbed GWS, nothing players can do to manage those moments!

Ultimately, the Filth took their opportunities no matter how they were delivered, they might be lucky but hard work also tends to make you lucky!
The Force Awakens!

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #250
Let's not forget the impact of the umpiring non-decisions that robbed GWS, nothing players can do to manage those moments!

Ultimately, the Filth took their opportunities no matter how they were delivered, they might be lucky but hard work also tends to make you lucky!

As the saying goes, the harder you work, the "luckier" you get.

With the Pies, and Carlton, during the 2nd half of the year, they get a sniff, luck or otherwise, they find a way.

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #251
I guess the same could be said about going with two very good around the ground rucks when neither can play the support/tall forward role.


Yes, right there you have Melbourne's issue this year.

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #252
Yes, there's no hard and fast rule about ruck/forward combinations, but your point about not going with two one-dimensional rucks is pretty close to being a rule.  I guess the same could be said about going with two very good around the ground rucks when neither can play the support/tall forward role.

Pitto and the King, when they're on, make a formidable combination.  They weren't really on against McInerney but Cox and Cameron were on in the GF and limited McInerney's influence.

Levi will be preparing for his third season since we announced his retirement  ::)

Thats what i've been saying all along. This is why it relates to OUR team, and not other teams that play 2 rucks, or 1 ruck or whatever.

This is why i prefer when Jack plays backup ruck because he doesn't have to do much in the actual ruck, but he does a lot more around the ground than any of Pitto and TDK.

I said at the start of the year that all of this is dependent on TDK and IF he can learn to play another role, we are better off. If not, its a luxury we cannot afford.

I don't care if other teams play 1 ruck, or 23 rucks, that doesn't matter to me. What matters to me is OUR rucks and what they can (and can't do) and thats what effects balance.

Another thing (or 2) that works against us in this instance is....
1. Our bigger midfield and its inability to chase....or more to the point, catch anyone outside of a contest. See Cripps and Kennedy
2. Our 3rd (or 4th) taller defenders. Weitering, Kemp, McGovern, Marchbank all playing together (at times) down back mean we are extra tall down there.
Put it all together and we are asking our smaller/quicker mids (and forwards) to simply do too much to run, chase, tackle and pressure.

So yes, team balance is about our team, not other teams because it is about OUR players, and rucks.

 

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #253
Thats what i've been saying all along. This is why it relates to OUR team, and not other teams that play 2 rucks, or 1 ruck or whatever.

This is why i prefer when Jack plays backup ruck because he doesn't have to do much in the actual ruck, but he does a lot more around the ground than any of Pitto and TDK.

I said at the start of the year that all of this is dependent on TDK and IF he can learn to play another role, we are better off. If not, its a luxury we cannot afford.

I don't care if other teams play 1 ruck, or 23 rucks, that doesn't matter to me. What matters to me is OUR rucks and what they can (and can't do) and thats what effects balance.

Another thing (or 2) that works against us in this instance is....
1. Our bigger midfield and its inability to chase....or more to the point, catch anyone outside of a contest. See Cripps and Kennedy
2. Our 3rd (or 4th) taller defenders. Weitering, Kemp, McGovern, Marchbank all playing together (at times) down back mean we are extra tall down there.
Put it all together and we are asking our smaller/quicker mids (and forwards) to simply do too much to run, chase, tackle and pressure.

So yes, team balance is about our team, not other teams because it is about OUR players, and rucks.

Nothing like flogging a dead horse 🙄

I think that most folk agree that playing Jack Silvagni as second ruck does not work.  He might get the odd clearance but the opposition second stringers touch him up.  McInerney and Daniher would have a picnic, as would Cox and Cameron.

Backing up in the ruck also affects Jack’s output as third tall forward.

Our best ruck combination, until someone else comes along, is Pittonet and De Koning, followed by De Koning and O’Keeffe, then Pittonet and O’Keeffe.

The solution to the lack of foot speed by some of our mids isn’t playing the even slower Silvagni as a second ruck.

Anyway, we won 11 of our last 13, the only team to do so, and I think the MC have got the team balance exactly where it should be.
“Why don’t you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don’t you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don’t you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?”  Oddball

Re: AFL 2023 Preliminary Final Carlton vs Brisbane Post Game Prognostications

Reply #254
Nothing like flogging a dead horse 🙄
Just pointing out that you agree with me without realising it.

I think that most folk agree that playing Jack Silvagni as second ruck does not work.  He might get the odd clearance but the opposition second stringers touch him up.  McInerney and Daniher would have a picnic, as would Cox and Cameron.

Backing up in the ruck also affects Jack’s output as third tall forward.

Our best ruck combination, until someone else comes along, is Pittonet and De Koning, followed by De Koning and O’Keeffe, then Pittonet and O’Keeffe.

The solution to the lack of foot speed by some of our mids isn’t playing the even slower Silvagni as a second ruck.

Anyway, we won 11 of our last 13, the only team to do so, and I think the MC have got the team balance exactly where it should be.
Your comments about us 'suffering' in the ruck by comparison and Jacks output as a forward have both been debunked with stats, but you continue to push it. So be it. I don't expect to change your mind.

I will point out when you agree with the logic behind it.
I will point out when any objections are untrue.