Carlton Supporters Club

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023

Reply #30 – September 07, 2023, 08:31:16 am

Is this a particularly even leaderboard Crash?

Apart from some of Charlie’s efforts, the games Cez dominated and Weiter’s heroics, our season has been memorable for solid contributions by the team as a whole.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023

Reply #31 – September 07, 2023, 04:14:22 pm

There has never been a season where so many players get recognized in single games, and not just because I spread the votes out. There has been a big spread most weeks, even when we were losing.
At it is unusual to be so close at the top. In the past, one or two players clear out from the rest. Not this year.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023

Reply #32 – September 16, 2023, 06:25:44 pm

AFL 1st Semi Final:   Carlton vs Sydney
Our first final for a decade and an excellent result.

Trends:
[1]   There were 10 voters this week, a really small number for such a significant game. Such is life, but I did expect more.
Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.

[2]   The rating was a 9.17, which is an B. Probably s sign of what we've got used to in the last couple of months. Still, it was a terrific win.

[3]   16 players managed a mention again this week, which shows just how we've played for the last couple of months. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been in the last half of the season.

[4]   The average vote this week was 37. I don't think that can be right, but I can't find any error yet.

[5]   6 players managed 100 votes or more this week. It shows that we had a good group of significant players.

[6]   Blake Acres managed  337 votes to be BOG this week, his first for us. Sam Walsh was only a handful of votes behind.

[7]   3 players, Acres, Walsh and Cottrell, were awarded votes from everyone this week. The rest of the votes were well spread.

[8]   Our youngsters continued to make an impression, an excellent signs moving forwards.

[9]   There was no one area of dominance this week, but all areas really made a contribution.

Votes:
Acres, Blake  337
Walsh, Sam  325
Cerra, Adam  225
Cottrell, Matthew  208
Martin, Jack   131
Weitering, Jacob  108
de Koning, Tom  86
Saad, Adam  86
Hollands, Oliver  57
Docherty, Sam  51
Newman, Nicholas  40
Kennedy, Matthew  11
Hewett, George  11
Fogarty, Lachie  11 
Cripps, Patrick  6
Pittonet, Marc  6

Progressive votes:
3145 - Curnow, Charles (33)
3101 - Cerra, Adam (46)
2840 - Newman, Nicholas (42)
2486 - Weitering, Jacob (230)
2323 - Walsh, Sam (235)
2225 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
2202 - Docherty, Sam (0)
1871 - Acres, Blake (102)
1090 - Hewett, George (56)
1058 - de Koning, Tom (221)
1036 - McKay, Harrison (28)
867 - Saad, Adam (19)
839 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
835 - McGovern, Mitchell (60)
604 - Kemp, Brodie (37)
521 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
504 - Young, Lewis (0)
484 - Martin, Jack (0)
480 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
411 - Motlop, Jesse (0)
385 - Curnow, Edward (0)
372 - Owies, Matthew (33)
364 - Hollands, Oliver (0)
326 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
291 - Dow, Patrick (60)
218 - Cincotta, Alex (0)
195 - Fisher, Zac (5)
86 - Cuningham, David (33)
67 - Durdin, Corey (0)
59 - Fogarty, Lachlan (10)
39 - Jordan Boyd (0)
10 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2023

Reply #33 – September 27, 2023, 02:31:16 pm

AFL 1st Semi Final:   Carlton vs Melbourne
Another win in a very important game.

Trends:
[1]   There were 13 voters this week, still fewer than I expected, but much better than last week.
Please do take the time to vote: it makes our statistics a lot more reliable and, more importantly, it shows how active we are on the forum.

[2]   The rating was a 9.69, which is an A-. Probably a sign of what we've got used to in the last couple of months. Still, it was a terrific win.

[3]   14 players managed a mention again this week, which shows just how we've played for the last couple of months. Just about everyone had a really solid contribution. Since I've been doing this we've never been this consistent all over the board as we've been in the last half of the season.

[4]   The average vote this week was 37. I don't think that can be right, but I can't find any error yet.

[5]   6 players managed 100 votes or more this week. It shows that we had a good group of significant players.

[6]   Sam Walsh managed a massive 460 votes to be BOG this week. He has certainly stepped up this finals series. Cripps and Ares filled 2nd and 3rd places.

[7]   1 player, Sam Walsh managed votes from everyone this week. Acres, Cripps and Weitering missed one voter.

[8]   Our youngsters continued to make an impression, an excellent signs moving forwards. Motlop in particular.

[9]   TOur midfield and defence were the dominant areas this week. Our forwards were not as affective as they have been.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam  460
Cripps, Patrick  243
Acres, Blake  239
Weitering, Jacob  208
de Koning, Tom  152
Newman, Nicholas  108
Saad, Adam  69
Docherty, Sam  69
Motlop, Jesse  48
Pittonet, Marc  35
Cerra, Adam  22
Hewett, George  4
Fogarty, Lachlan  4

Progressive Voting:
3145 - Curnow, Charles (33)
3123 - Cerra, Adam (46)
2948 - Newman, Nicholas (42)
2783 - Walsh, Sam (235)
2694 - Weitering, Jacob (230)
2468 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
2271 - Docherty, Sam (0)
2110 - Acres, Blake (102)
1210 - de Koning, Tom (221)
1094 - Hewett, George (56)
1036 - McKay, Harrison (28)
936 - Saad, Adam (19)
839 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
835 - McGovern, Mitchell (60)
604 - Kemp, Brodie (37)
521 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
504 - Young, Lewis (0)
484 - Martin, Jack (0)
480 - Kennedy, Matthew (0)
459 - Motlop, Jesse (0)
385 - Curnow, Edward (0)
372 - Owies, Matthew (33)
364 - Hollands, Oliver (0)
361 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
291 - Dow, Patrick (60)
218 - Cincotta, Alex (0)
195 - Fisher, Zac (5)
86 - Cuningham, David (33)
67 - Durdin, Corey (0)
63 - Fogarty, Lachlan (10)
39 - Jordan Boyd (0)
10 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)

It is very close at the top; only 22 votes between 1st and 2nd.