Skip to main content
Topic: 9/11 Debate (Read 20018 times) previous topic - next topic - Topic derived from CV and mad panic beha...
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #255
Something I’ve noted over the years is that amongst new agers, anti vaxxers, and conspiracy “theorists” is that to a man and woman they think they are smarter than the average joe.
They cherry pick their “experts” add in some “common sense” and add a little personal touch/life story.

If the government is so powerful and well organised as to be able to influence so many individuals to keep their despicable and criminal acts secret from the public how then do they allow these “experts” to expose their wrongdoings  on YouTube ?

Far better in my opinion to watch reruns of Xfiles, A grade conspiracy’s from the comfort of your lounge...
Let’s go BIG !

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #256
Something I’ve noted over the years is that amongst new agers, anti vaxxers, and conspiracy “theorists” is that to a man and woman they think they are smarter than the average joe.
They cherry pick their “experts” add in some “common sense” and add a little personal touch/life story.

If the government is so powerful and well organised as to be able to influence so many individuals to keep their despicable and criminal acts secret from the public how then do they allow these “experts” to expose their wrongdoings  on YouTube ?

Far better in my opinion to watch reruns of Xfiles, A grade conspiracy’s from the comfort of your lounge...

Its amazing how the conspiracy anti theorists (for want of a better word) also seem to share the same hubris when dismissing said conspiracies.

Not all of them are equal.

What we are seeing is a residual burnout of more and more people as they feel like they've been lied to.

Anti vaccination...  nope.
5g... nope.
Covid19...  has elements of dodginess to it.  Hence why rolling a vaccine into it is problematic for people who are sick of being lied to.

9/11 dodgy but in lieu of other details ill accept parts of it.  The planes did hit buildings, not the pentagon and I dont know what caused that one.  Were they piloted by middle easterners...  not likely.  This one isn't one conspiracy hoax, its about 10 rolled into one which is why it divides so many opinions and why people have a hard time believing it.

I think people are just worn out from all the crap.

Remember the allegedly election tampering from both sides, the leaked Hillary emails.

All of it just adds up to a bunch of people told so many mistruths and half truths that they really don't know what to believe any more.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #257
What we are seeing is a residual burnout of more and more people as they feel like they've been lied to.

I think people are just worn out from all the crap.
Ironic, given it's the conspiracy nutters generate the vast bulk of the lies, doctor videos, publish deep fakes, etc., etc..!

They see themselves as whistle-blowers, when they are really crying wolf!
The Force Awakens!

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #258
I like this one, the guy standing in the engine... that engine is about the size of the whole planes hole in the pentagon...
And there were 2 engines.....and the rest of the plane.
 What a stupid statement, worse than Trump, making Trump look like a conservative!
The Force Awakens!

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #259
75 foot hole?



I suspect the above is a fake image composite of two separate images, a hole left inside the Pentagon basement and a view of the outside façade.

Here is the real view from inside the basement. The possible fake even has the chamfer remaining on the upper right corner.

The Force Awakens!

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #260
75 foot hole?

The 75ft hole is where the fuselage hit, not the secondary hole where the right engine hit.

I suspect the above is either a fake image composite of two separate images, a hole left inside the Pentagon basement and a view of the outside façade, or it's the secondary hole in the pentagon wall made by the right engine.

Here is the view from inside the basement, the chamfer remaining on the upper right corner poses a big question!



This highlights the fundamental problem with the conspiracy theorists, they invent so many facts they start to contradict each other, then end up fighting amongst themselves about who is correct, they don't want some competitor eventing a fact that undoes there own reality, and it is so easy to start the argument between them it's a joke!

The web ends up flooded with fake reports and fake images, the business of producing poor quality fakes is just too easy, and finding the verified reports and imagery becomes harder and harder because the search algorithms favour the fakes.
The Force Awakens!

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #261
Something I’ve noted over the years is that amongst new agers, anti vaxxers, and conspiracy “theorists” is that to a man and woman they think they are smarter than the average joe.
They cherry pick their “experts” add in some “common sense” and add a little personal touch/life story.

If the government is so powerful and well organised as to be able to influence so many individuals to keep their despicable and criminal acts secret from the public how then do they allow these “experts” to expose their wrongdoings  on YouTube ?

Far better in my opinion to watch reruns of Xfiles, A grade conspiracy’s from the comfort of your lounge...

I'd say it's more about curiosity rather than intelligence.

Most people can't be bothered questioning the official narrative.....busy with life, work, raising kids, footy, buying a new SUV etc.

Moreover, with respect to 9/11 (and climate change for that matter) if you don't have a fair or better grasp of physics and chemistry you simply aren't going to get a lot of the arguments.... even if they are straight forward.

That's not necessarily a reflection on anyone's intelligence.
Finals, then 4 in a row!

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #262
Ironic, given it's the conspiracy nutters generate the vast bulk of the lies, doctor videos, publish deep fakes, etc., etc..!

They see themselves as whistle-blowers, when they are really crying wolf!

They are crying wolf because they see one, and are trying to alert others.

Whether or not there is one is sometimes a matter of what you want to believe as much as anything else.

This image sums up what I am saying best I think.




At the end of the day, the "conspiracy nutters" to coin your phrase, might just have a different view of things, and rather than be lumped into one pot, perhaps if you took the time to understand them, they might have a point.  A broken clock is still right twice a day.

I know one anti vaxer family that needs to believe that rhetoric because they say that not everyone responds the same way, and they are generally correct with this statement.

The fact that they use this to explain their son's autism disorder is another tenuous link, but not one completely without foundation, and belittling their perspective serves only to cast judgement on them, and not understand them.

Ultimately, we get lied to a lot by governments.  THEY are the ones that deserve to be questioned, and we should never shout down someone questioning the official line, because they are the ones that might have been the ones to call out the holocaust, but too many people might have told them that they were crazy, and there is no way that the mass extermination of people could be occurring in their own backyard.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #263
The fact that they use this to explain their son's autism disorder is another tenuous link, but not one completely without foundation, and belittling their perspective serves only to cast judgement on them, and not understand them.

Ultimately, we get lied to a lot by governments.  THEY are the ones that deserve to be questioned, and we should never shout down someone questioning the official line, because they are the ones that might have been the ones to call out the holocaust, but too many people might have told them that they were crazy, and there is no way that the mass extermination of people could be occurring in their own backyard.
Btw., What they might suffer from is confirmation bias, not a conspiracy at all, so nobody is really belittling them!

In regards to the confirmation bias, the problem is the tenuous links from a confirmation bias aren't a foundation for a cause at all, the absence of evidence isn't confirmation of a great conspiracy or a real world effect. It's just correlation. The problem is humans do not weigh these effects evenly, just like we make a big deal about someone getting ill in correlation to receiving a vaccine, while ignoring the vast bulk who do not.

Science and medicine doesn't ignore those who get ill from a vaccine shot, they investigate them, it's not a cover up.

That "They" is interesting, in the context you use it it means "us and them", the trouble is when the "they" is government the them is really us, the bulk of the government are ordinary Jills and Joes going about the daily grind. The biggest employer in the land. Like health industry workers, which in the context that you use it "they" would be all part of the "they", doesn't that include yourself?

Most conspiracies and conspiracists are fundamentally are looking for someone to blame, ironically in the 9/11 stuff it seems the dead blokes who hijacked the planes and Osama bin Laden aren't enough, they want to blame somebody living! They seem to want revenge, and a sacrifice.

I do wonder how much Daesh manipulate these forums, the Australian who was arrested was a specialist in social media and communications studies, someone who made a career from digital social influence.
The Force Awakens!

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #264
Btw., What they might suffer from is confirmation bias, not a conspiracy at all, so nobody is really belittling them!

In regards to the confirmation bias, the problem is the tenuous links from a confirmation bias aren't a foundation for a cause at all, the absence of evidence isn't confirmation of a great conspiracy or a real world effect. It's just correlation. The problem is humans do not weigh these effects evenly, just like we make a big deal about someone getting ill in correlation to receiving a vaccine, while ignoring the vast bulk who do not.

Science and medicine doesn't ignore those who get ill from a vaccine shot, they investigate them, it's not a cover up.

That "They" is interesting, in the context you use it it means "us and them", the trouble is when the "they" is government the them is really us, the bulk of the government are ordinary Jills and Joes going about the daily grind. The biggest employer in the land. Like health industry workers, which in the context that you use it "they" would be all part of the "they", doesn't that include yourself?

Most conspiracies and conspiracists are fundamentally are looking for someone to blame, ironically in the 9/11 stuff it seems the dead blokes who hijacked the planes and Osama bin Laden aren't enough, they want to blame somebody living! They seem to want revenge, and a sacrifice.

I do wonder how much Daesh manipulate these forums, the Australian who was arrested was a specialist in social media and communications studies, someone who made a career from digital social influence.

Not all levels of government employee are the same, and I too being one, see exactly what lies, half truths and mistruths are reported.

Ill refer you back to Nazi Germany.

"Just do it."

The soldiers are complicit and execute the orders leading to the action, but they are just following orders that they havent questioned.

Who do you think sounds more like that?  The conspiracy nutters?  Or those telling them they are nutters, and that everyone is perfectly safe, after all the science says so.

My perspective is, that I can only trust my own eyes, and my own ears, and everything else is hearsay be it double blind and tested, because ultimately, all we are doing is putting our faith in one organisation or  set of people over another.  Then you introduce corruption, or even a simple formula used commonly in manufacturing processes, and you end up with a cost benefit analysis occurring.

THAT is the part that everyone understands, which gives birth to all the questions, correlations, confirmation biases etc.

The definition of ironic, is having yourself pointed at every single juxtaposition you hold, and continue to undermine the opposite opinion by calling people things like conspiracy nutters.

My friends are simply explaining away something the best way they know how, because the truth is, that their combination of genes, may very well be the reason their child has autism, and its often easier to externalise that blame, rather than wear it yourself and part of the issue is the way we recognise ASD these days.

Keep that in mind in context of there is no such thing as normal.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #265
My perspective is, that I can only trust my own eyes, and my own ears, and everything else is hearsay be it double blind and tested, because ultimately, all we are doing is putting our faith in one organisation or  set of people over another.  Then you introduce corruption, or even a simple formula used commonly in manufacturing processes, and you end up with a cost benefit analysis occurring.
The first part of good science is doing the exact opposite, not making assumptions about the validity of your personal perceptions and not trusting your common sense perceptions.

Good science in the double blind is designed to ignore personal human bias, most problems with science arise when individuals refuse to believe the results of studies because they fly against common sense experience.

The last bit, the cost benefit part, often has little to do with science, I've seen many times good science ignored because of an economic analysis. It's not part of the science. A good example is choosing short term benefits over long term benefits, the good science is ignored all the time like in the climate change debate.

This is universally a human problem, nature always obeys the science it's just that it takes humans a long long time to work it out!
The Force Awakens!

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #266
Not all levels of government employee are the same, and I too being one, see exactly what lies, half truths and mistruths are reported.

Ill refer you back to Nazi Germany.

"Just do it."

The soldiers are complicit and execute the orders leading to the action, but they are just following orders that they havent questioned.

Who do you think sounds more like that?  The conspiracy nutters?  Or those telling them they are nutters, and that everyone is perfectly safe, after all the science says so.

My perspective is, that I can only trust my own eyes, and my own ears, and everything else is hearsay be it double blind and tested, because ultimately, all we are doing is putting our faith in one organisation or  set of people over another.  Then you introduce corruption, or even a simple formula used commonly in manufacturing processes, and you end up with a cost benefit analysis occurring.

THAT is the part that everyone understands, which gives birth to all the questions, correlations, confirmation biases etc.

The definition of ironic, is having yourself pointed at every single juxtaposition you hold, and continue to undermine the opposite opinion by calling people things like conspiracy nutters.

My friends are simply explaining away something the best way they know how, because the truth is, that their combination of genes, may very well be the reason their child has autism, and its often easier to externalise that blame, rather than wear it yourself and part of the issue is the way we recognise ASD these days.

Keep that in mind in context of there is no such thing as normal.
My wife (a teacher) was blamed by a mother for her childs autism. True story.
As for nutters, the only nutters were the hijackers who flew the planes into to the buildings killing 3000 innocent people (oh and maybe the mum who blamed my wife for causing her kids autism).
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #267
I have no problem with folks questioning 'official' versions of events.

But many seem to just stop there.
They've made up their mind.
They don't take the questioning any further.
They've picked their side and they've identified (very vaguely) a villain

But as LP suggests.....put another hat on and argue the opposite.

Again... Who, How Many and Why

Put a couple of planes into  a building....there's your war.
Why bring the buildings down on top of New York's finest?
It cant be to hide evidence because any investigators would no doubt have to be complicit for the plot to work.
And with that many people killed some of  the plotters would no doubt have had friends and relatives amongst the dead.

Who's idea?...the President's, the military.
How do you go from.... "I've got an idea how to start a war" to executing 9/11?
How do you gather people to your cause.
You would have to be a super judge of character to get that right because one wrong choice and you're sunk.
Somewhere along the way someone who's drawn into it with a bit of a conscience is bound to say "whoa"

In the twenty years since (as far as I know) they've been no 'deathbed confessions'(Edit- apparently there was one a Malcolm Howard.)...there's been no "I can't live with what I've done" suicides.
Even if your small part was something you didn't know you were doing at the time the after-guilt would be enough to drive you a little crazy.

And one can only imagine the damage to the country's stability and political structure if it were found to be true...not to mention the fate of those involved.

Even if some of the physics raise questions the human side of things (in terms of an American involvement) just doesn't make any sense.








Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #268
With autism, I suspect parents prefer to find a scapegoat to take all the blame given that their genetics and age at conception are likely suspects. One guy I played football with has a girl with Aspergers and when he went to some specialist he was surprised when he was told she may have inherited it from him. He’d never realised he might qualify for that diagnosis but I had to bite my tongue when he told me as it’s so obvious.

That’s not to say parents who pass on heritable conditions to their children should feel guilty. But how difficult would it be to see your children suffer when you do feel guilty about it.

Re: 9/11 Debate

Reply #269
I admit I'm too quick to use disparaging terms like "nutters", it's really a sign of frustration when some of those involved in a debate blatantly choose to ignore or consider very solid evidence rather than explain how the conspiracies account for it.

But I'll repeat what I said earlier, it's very wrong to lump someone suffering confirmation bias like those with autistic children, in with the group I would refer to as "Conspiracy Nutters" like 9/11 or COVID-19 vaccines!

Vaccines do not have 5G chips in them, 9/11 wasn't caused by cruise missiles, etc., etc., the stranger the claims become the less sensible the debate becomes.
The Force Awakens!