Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle (Read 13095 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #15 –
Quote from: crashlander – on
The 5 4 3 2 1 voting system is the easiest for my to enter, but I find that it doesn't give me an opportunity to give votes to as many players who may deserve a mention or to grade them sufficiently. But I am the extreme case. Others follow it rigidly: the other extreme.
I don't care as long as the votes add up.

I used to apportion votes out to as many players as I thought worthy Crash but I changed to the 5 4 3 2 1 voting system several seasons ago.  I like the discipline of selecting five players even if it is a close thing between fifth, sixth and seventh best or the length of the straight between fourth and fifth.

I thought it would be easier to process too  :)
"Negative waves are not helpful. Try saying something righteous and hopeful instead." Oddball

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #16 –
Team. C

5. White
4. Docherty
2. Curnow
2. Buckley
1. Murphy
1. Bell
I spent most of my money on Women and grog.
The rest I just wasted.

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #17 –
Team C-

3 - Buckley

3 - Docherty

2 - Curnow

2 - Murphy

2 - White

1 - Bell

1 - Kreuzer

1 - Tutt
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #18 –
Team - D

5 - White
4 - Murphy
3 - Docherty
2 - Buckley
1 - Bell

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #19 –
Team C
6 White
4 Buckley
3 Docherty
2 Murphy
 

Re: Jim Park Voting Round #16 Carlton vs. Fremantle

Reply #20 –
Team D

4: White
4: Murphy
3: Buckley
2: Kreuzer
2: Docherty