Re: Brownlow 2017 Reply #30 – September 26, 2017, 09:32:10 am Geez last night highlighted just how political has the AFL become? Think Sam Newman had a point!The count should be about showcasing the best players of the year and that alone and in that case could be done comfortably in 90-120 mins but they drag it on and on with all the BS segments in between every round.I used to really enjoy the brownlow but like many things about the AFL these days reckon they have ruined it. Quote Selected
Re: Brownlow 2017 Reply #31 – September 26, 2017, 09:41:31 am Quote from: shawny – on September 26, 2017, 09:32:10 amGeez last night highlighted just how political has the AFL become? Think Sam Newman had a point!The count should be about showcasing the best players of the year and that alone and in that case could be done comfortably in 90-120 mins but they drag it on and on with all the BS segments in between every round.I used to really enjoy the brownlow but like many things about the AFL these days reckon they have ruined it.The AFL is morphing into show business (and bloody big business at that) rather than sport. Razzamatazz is everything! Quote Selected
Re: Brownlow 2017 Reply #32 – September 26, 2017, 10:49:52 am Quote from: Gointocarlton – on September 25, 2017, 10:20:39 pmPast winner automatically invited.... and puts the medal around the winner's neck (similar to the previous winner presenting the green jacket to the winner of the US Open (?)).Come to think of it, that might be a bit unfair. Imagine if Danger hadn't been suspended and was in the lead in the last round only to be pipped at the last second. Then he would have had to affix a nice smile and hand over the medal he almost won ... brutal. Quote Selected Last Edit: September 26, 2017, 10:53:58 am by Mav
Re: Brownlow 2017 Reply #33 – September 26, 2017, 02:09:23 pm Quote from: Mav – on September 26, 2017, 10:49:52 am... and puts the medal around the winner's neck (similar to the previous winner presenting the green jacket to the winner of the US Open (?)).Come to think of it, that might be a bit unfair. Imagine if Danger hadn't been suspended and was in the lead in the last round only to be pipped at the last second. Then he would have had to affix a nice smile and hand over the medal he almost won ... brutal. What if a player goes back to back, does he present the medal to himself? Quote Selected