Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #90 – May 22, 2018, 06:23:32 pm Quote from: kruddler – on May 22, 2018, 06:00:09 pmSo if i'm reading between the lines, we are 0.05% above where we were when Mick got sacked?Pretty depressing given that all we have to hold on to is the hope that we are on the right path.Nicely read Look, it's a goal for the second half of the year that we at least make this percentage a little more respectable. A small goal but sometimes the "baby steps" are the best. We finished the year on 64.8% in 2015...if we can't beat that we really are in strife. Quote Selected Last Edit: May 22, 2018, 06:41:02 pm by Lods
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #91 – May 28, 2018, 03:23:47 pm After Round 102016Goals 105 Behinds 100- (points for 730 - against 901)Percentage 81 %2017 Goals 107 Behinds 86- (points for 728 against 923)Percentage 78.9 %2018 (2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)Goals-93 Behinds - 94Percentage 63.2 % (For- 652, Against- 1032)Goalkickers (2017 Target Casboult 34)2017Casboult 17Wright 13Silvagni 8Gibbs 82018Curnow 14McKay 12Casboult 11Wright 11Fisher- 7Despite an improved performance we still dropped 0.1% on percentage this week from what was an already very low base.That was compounded by our low score and late goals to Geelong.Goalkicking remains an issue and we're starting to slip off the pace in our chase after last year's total.Defence has now conceded 100 points more than this stage last year.On the positive side we did have plenty of shots...just the wrong side of the post. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #92 – May 28, 2018, 07:34:29 pm Looks like we're creating more opportunity to score but not as efficient as we were. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #93 – May 29, 2018, 05:05:53 pm Quote from: Thryleon – on May 28, 2018, 07:34:29 pmLooks like we're creating more opportunity to score but not as efficient as we were.We used to be a lot more patient when making our inside 50 entries in the past. Painstakingly so in some cases.We can still see a little bit of that now, but there is more hit and hope now, or trying to force a kick that isn't quite there. We are not skilled enough to do this. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #94 – May 29, 2018, 05:36:05 pm Quote from: kruddler – on May 29, 2018, 05:05:53 pmWe used to be a lot more patient when making our inside 50 entries in the past. Painstakingly so in some cases.We can still see a little bit of that now, but there is more hit and hope now, or trying to force a kick that isn't quite there. We are not skilled enough to do this.It's not all to do with us, the umpiring has changed again, they are giving the ball carrier less and less time be it from a loose possession or from a mark.I heard some commentary allegedly from Hocking that they want to be even tighter again. Pretty soon they'll be calling players to play on or for holding the ball before they actually get it! Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #95 – June 04, 2018, 09:08:45 pm After Round 112016Goals 121 Behinds 106-(For 832 - against 965)Percentage 86.2 %2017 Goals 117 Behinds 97-(For 799 - against 993)Percentage 80.5 %2018 (2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)Goals-102 Behinds - 101Percentage 63.5 % (For- 713, Against- 1123)Goalkickers (2017 Target Casboult 34)2017Casboult 18Wright 15Silvagni 9Gibbs 92018Curnow 16M Wright 12McKay 12Casboult 11Fisher- 7 Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #96 – June 18, 2018, 08:11:49 am After 12 games2016Goals 133 Behinds 112-(For 910 against 1075)Percentage 84.7 %2017 Goals 129 Behinds 108-(For 882 against 1066)Percentage 82.7 %2018 (2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)Goals-108 Behinds - 111Percentage 61.9 % (For- 759, Against- 1226)Goalkickers (2017 Target Casboult 34)2017Casboult 18Wright 16Silvagni 11Gibbs 112018Curnow 16M Wright 14McKay 12Casboult 12 Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #97 – June 18, 2018, 08:18:31 am Casboult better get a move on for that 50 goals he was easily going to kick.Ironically if we played Harry McKay every game he would go close. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #98 – June 18, 2018, 11:01:52 am Quote from: madbluboy – on June 18, 2018, 08:18:31 amCasboult better get a move on for that 50 goals he was easily going to kick.Ironically if we played Harry McKay every game he would go close.Bit hard for forwards to kick goals when your midfield goes AWOL.Let alone when you're coming off a 5-6 week layoff post injury....shouldn't have been picked in the 1s. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #99 – June 18, 2018, 05:37:36 pm Quote from: flyboy77 – on June 18, 2018, 11:01:52 amBit hard for forwards to kick goals when your midfield goes AWOL.Let alone when you're coming off a 5-6 week layoff post injury....shouldn't have been picked in the 1s.I'm not sure if it was you who made the comment MBB was referring too...BUT....you have to factor in the fact that we have a very average size when making any such predictions. You can't use our midfield going AWOL as an excuse, as when we have a young inexperienced midfield, it will go AWOL regularly. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #100 – June 26, 2018, 08:29:53 pm After 13 games2016 Goals 142 Behinds 123-(For 975 against 1202)Percentage 81.1 %2017(Target 224-224-1568)Goals 137 Behinds 118-(For 940 against 1150 )Percentage 81.7 %2018 (2017 Target 232 Goals- 202 behinds-1594)Goals-117 Behinds - 116Percentage 62.7 % (For- 818, Against- 1305)Goalkickers (2017 Target Casboult 34)2017Casboult 20Wright 17Silvagni 11Gibbs 112018Curnow 19M Wright 14McKay 12Casboult 12Despite the loss we managed to improve our percentage (slightly) this week. Quote Selected Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 08:32:09 pm by Lods
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #101 – June 26, 2018, 08:41:32 pm Thanks for your work on this Lods. Much appreciated. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #102 – June 26, 2018, 08:49:20 pm Quote from: PaulP – on June 26, 2018, 08:41:32 pmThanks for your work on this Lods. Much appreciated.Thanks Paul It's actually not a lot of trouble...the 2016 and 2017 are just a copy and paste.The 2018 is just adding the score from the weekend.And the Goalkickers are just a copy /paste from FootwireIt takes about five minutes.Just a shame the figures aren't trending upwards....hopefully we can make a dent in the remaining games. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #103 – June 27, 2018, 09:12:59 am Quote from: Lods – on June 26, 2018, 08:29:53 pmCurnow 19M Wright 14McKay 12Casboult 12Some positives:We have covered Gibbs’ contribution from 2017.Two of our top four goalkickers weren’t in the top four last season.One of our top four goalkickers can’t get a game!Very much a work in progress but there are some promising signs Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2018 Reply #104 – June 27, 2018, 12:31:05 pm Quote from: DJC – on June 27, 2018, 09:12:59 amSome positives:We have covered Gibbs’ contribution from 2017.Two of our top four goalkickers weren’t in the top four last season.One of our top four goalkickers can’t get a game!Very much a work in progress but there are some promising signs Thats a false positive (the bold one).He's top 4 for goal kicking because we are so poor at kicking goals as a team and it can be argued that Mckay wouldnt be in anyone elses top 4 goal kickers at another club.If he was sitting top 4 for goals kicked, and the top two had kicked 100 between them, then this might be a positive. Quote Selected
Topic: Goaltracker 2018 (Read 57720 times)
previous topic - next topic
Topic: Goaltracker 2018 (Read 57720 times)
previous topic - next topic