Not you, shawny and dodge.
Solely on that original donation mentioned there's no benefit.
Add in some tax deductions for travel, costs of living like hotels, airfares, car expenses, educational stuff for "research", other income tax breaks such as paying yourself via a contracted company based in the cayman Islands and then he tips into charity to help and comes out with the deals you mention all to look like a philanthropist.
Thats not to condemn him. Good on him, probably costs him nothing and gives him the exact perks and public reputation, but its not that long ago that Lewis Hamilton had a very different reputation in the world.
Perhaps time and age have humbled him. Declaring an outright position here is fraught with danger. He might be an A1 bloke, or he could be a real tosser. You wouldnt know for sure.
Good luck to him and all that support him.
Thryleon what are you on about!
My comments were in reply to Kruddler post saying if your going to lose money to the government via tax he might as well give it to a charity. I explained that paying to a charity instead of paying the is not equal so implying it is was incorrect
None of my posts discussed anything more but to clarify there is a vast difference.
While im not a big fan of LH his charity work and/or his reasoning why I never commented on - that was all the spin Kruddler added to not admit his first post was incorrect.
Anyhow thats it from me on the matter, I can see i wont convince him so wasting my time.
Shawny, ive said what i said, re read it. what part of it didnt you understand?
@Dodge what part of tax deductible donations didnt you understand?
I dont really care one iota either way, but im not going over old ground again to spell it out for you.