Re: CV and mad panic behaviour
Reply #5882 –
MAV. Very interesting reading. I rarely speak unless I have a serious passion about a topic and what you say has another interesting subject matter for me to bring up. I suddenly feel like I might become the noisy little blue arse fly that gets trapped between your bedroom window and the drapes at night. Bzzzzzz bouncing against the glass until you have had enough that you waste an entire can of Mortein spray to shut the bugger up to get some sleep. Back to two topics now. I read a few times some small concerns about particular vaccines that have been changed in certain countries based on what is being noticed in the real world. Not from previous tests but more so what government bodies have seen as tends after they expose the use on the population of the people. I think Moderna was one that was questioned for certain people and was not recommended for continuous use in certain people. May it be age or what particular reasons. I think age appears to be one of the reasons we have different vaccines. I assume they use different ways to do the spike protein process to have the human body build antibodies to help deal with SARS type natural immunity. If the government bodies of certain countries have changed how they advise immunisation then this is a start to better manage potential health implications to their communities. It must be case that under initial advisory steps are taken by manufacturers of medications and test performed to consider them safe to begin with. However things change in the real world and it is the duty of care for the government to monitor and make changes accordingly. Don’t rush to get the masses vaccinated as a form of a race to see which country leads the statistics on percentage of fully vaccinated people. This isn’t AFL, NFL, FIFA grand final, super bowl, World Cup etc bragging rights.
You are attempting to protect the community and serve your people and need to do it with some form of due diligence. Think once, twice and three times before you act and put systems in place. The old school rule of risk assessment and monitor the results regularly. Make changes as required. Put a stop to a program temporarily while further risk management gives you better confidence to help protect everyone. Is it a stupid method of better health and well-being of all? Maybe? Real life statistics and implementation of real risk management.
Onto my new dilemma. This blue arse fly will do your head in MAV, so I apologise in advance. Let me state you own a cafe in the city of Melbourne. You probably don’t but for the exercise let us say you do. As we get further along with the vaccinated population of 80% plus fully dosed people, you will need to have a certain allowed number of patrons come to consume food and beverages at your cafe by the end of this year 2021. Some indoor and some outside if the premises allow to do so. Assuming a 4 square metre rule, maybe 2 square metre rule. Maybe 1.5m social distancing. There will be some form of limitations. Without being certain we will still have something in place to avoid large numbers in an area to avoid large spread of covid. Yes? Sounds feasible. Not silly but feasible and helping the people to avoid community transmission. I might come to your cafe as I would like to help small business and would appreciate you allowing me to make a booking. With further benefits I may be allowed to line up on the pavement and wait for my seat when it is available. Oops, small problem potential as it might have people not follow a 1.5m distancing gap and it might be a tiny issue at worst. Maybe these distance issues may be lifted by then. Maybe yes, or no. No certainty yet. I for some reason decided not to come to your cafe Mav. I again apologise as I have made another appointment. May we leave your cafe for 2022. I booked tickets in advance for the Boxing Day test match day one. Dan has allowed 80,000 to possible talks of 85,000 people. I am over the moon. Wow. How exciting. I can stand shoulder to shoulder for a while before the gates open. Great. Just lovely. Then I get to sit next to so many sweaty, smelly, and potentially infected people from around 10am in the morning and ending around 6pm in the afternoon. Eight hours of no gap between myself and the sweaty bastards around me. Not including the time it took me to enter the gates to get into the stadium. These are very large numbers. Probably not including staff supplying food and drinks. Security staff. Police and quite possibly more. Probably similar to Melbourne Cup. As you have mentioned. Does money rise above the needs for safety and our potential health? Is there something I don’t see or understand? Just asking the question. I don’t see consistency. The Cup had 10,000 people allowed to attend. Then we move towards 80,000 plus. Will there be restrictions on small businesses that doesn’t follow the same theme? Don’t play us for fools if this becomes the case. We do have the mental capacity to see through things where money might be a driving force for settings. I think we do if this becomes the case. Blue arse fly over and out.