Re: CV and mad panic behaviour
Reply #2987 –
Only one side of the debate is massaging numbers, the fake news vendors. That is where you go wrong trying to paint it as a level playing field of information. It isn't a level playing field, all the information is not the same quality, in just the same way all opinions are not equal.
The stats and numbers do not lie, they are not subject to human interpretation, influence or obfuscation, they are not like opinions that can be spun bent or twisted to an individuals will!
The emphasis on wanting COVID-19 deaths proven to support or refute the COVID-19 restrictions and other actions is also flawed, it's built on the premise that COVID-19 infections that aren't deadly are somehow OK! The evidence suggests the long term effects of long COVID-19 will potentially be far far costlier than the initial deaths. As abhorrent as it may read, a funeral is far far cheaper than a treatment or long term critical care!
You are asserting something yourself here.
That the statistics gathered are reliable accurate, and not embelished in any way shape or form. That any potential deaths attributed to vaccinations are not attributed to vaccinations but other causes, and that any one who is listed as a covid death, died because they got covid.
Deliberately muddying long covid into there is a bit false. The current batch are as asymptomatic as it gets unless they are reporting something I am missing.
You are confusing the data with the interpretation here. You state the data doesnt lie, but those giving us the statistics are interpreting the data themselves, ergo, they create the ability to hide things they dont want to display and vice versa, to pick up things they do. That vaccine deaths are correlation, and that covid deaths are causation is itself, an interpretation. Hence why Peru's numbers are changing based on advise from people internationally.