Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda

Topic: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda (Read 10007 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda

July 06, 2014, 09:45:15 pm

This is going to be a LOT more pleasant that it has been for quite a while. Hopefully a few more voters will come out of the woodwork to celebrate.

With only 29000 people there, and no free to air TV, it may not be that easy, but I can hope.
Thank you to everyone who voted during the last few weeks: it hasn't been easy. This week should be a different kettle of fish.

Remember:
[1] At least 3 players need to get a mention.
[2] No more than 10 votes for any one player.
[3] Give a rating of team performance
[4] Votes must add up to 15.

Re: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda

Reply #1 – July 06, 2014, 10:05:53 pm

C
4.Everitt
3.Walker
2.Yarran
2.Curnow
1.White
1.Casboult
1.Docherty
1.Jamison

Re: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda

Reply #2 – July 06, 2014, 10:12:02 pm

Team B-

4: Everitt
3 Curnow
2: Casboult
2: White:
1: Murphy
1: Yarran
1: Walker
1: Jamsion

Re: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda

Reply #3 – July 07, 2014, 12:24:39 am

Team A

3 Docherty
3 Everitt
3 Walker
2 White
2 Henderson
2 Casboult

Re: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda

Reply #4 – July 07, 2014, 01:08:52 am

Tough week as we need to consider the opposition.

Team B
5- Everitt
4- Docherty
3 - Murphy
2 - Walker
1 - Hendo

Re: Jim Park medal Voting: Carlton vs St. Kilda

Reply #5 – July 07, 2014, 10:04:01 am

Team:   B+
I couldn't give an 'A': the 2nd quarter was just inadequate after the 10 minute mark. But the rest? Excellent. Every single player made a useful contribution.
However, the pressure on us this week was much less than we've been dealing with in recent times.

Votes:
I found it really hard as so many players did something. However, after recent weeks I was glad to have it as a problem!

[3]   Everitt
[2.5]   Curnow
[2]   Walker
[1.5]   Yarran
[1]   White
[1]   Jamison
[1]   Rowe
[1]   Henderson
[0.5]   Docherty
[0.5]   Warnock
[0.5]   Carrazzo
[0.5]   Casboult

Explanations:
[3]   Everitt:   An excellent effort in an attacking role early and in a defensive role against Montagna. 13 marks says a lot in itself.
[2.5]   Curnow:   Took out not 1, but 2 players in a display that warmed the heart.
[2]   Walker:   Andrew has stagnated recently, but he was back to his hard running best this week. Much better.
[1.5]   Yarran:   had both positive and negative jobs and did them well. He was dangerous up forward and provided a lot of run.
[1]   White:   With no tall forward to match up on. Simon had to find another role. he did and managed 4 goals in the process. He marked strongly and kicked well.
[1]   Jamison:   Riewoldt may have had the ball 19 times, but he had absolutely no influence at all. On the other hand, Jamo had plenty of influence, both as a spae down back and as Riewoldt's direct opponent.
[1]   Rowe:   Like Jamo, Rowe did very well down back against the taller St. Kilda forwards. he did a decent job when against Riewoldt and against Stanley and took some nice marks.
[1]   Henderson:   Best game for ages! Hendo started moving better and holding his marks. Still a long way from his best, but it was definitely a move towards it.
[0.5]   Docherty:   Good effort.
[0.5]   Warnock:   Did a very good job against the St. Kilda ruckmen and aims his taps better than he has an any other time this year. Even managed a few bashes, which lead to Carlton scores.
[0.5]   Carrazzo:   Did an excellent defensive job until he was injured. He also managed a number of centre clearances.
[0.5]   Casboult:   Took a while to warm up, but when he did he managed to clunk some excellent marks and kick straight.

Honourable Mentions:
Murphy:   Did not appear dominant, but probably deserved a vote. He managed to get a lot of the ball after a quiet start and made the most of every disposal.
Judd:   Like Murphy, Judd started quietly, but came into the game when we needed some leadership. His work was telling.
McLean:   Deserved a vote, like Murphy, as he made a very useful contribution and made good use of the ball.
Tuohy:   One of his best games for the year, he managed to keep his opponents quiet and provide a lot of drive.
Johnson:   The lad played pretty well and showed he has a boot on him. His kicking need to get more reliable, but he showed a lot of desire.
Thomas:   Like many of our senior players, he did what he had to. He was always dangerous and really put his body in.
Menzel:   Totally dominant early, but a shoulder injury slowed him down.