Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Poll

Pick your best 22 players (22 votes allowed!)

1 - Walker
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
2 - Menzel
[ 18 ] (3.6%)
3 - Murphy
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
4 - Gibbs
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
5 - Judd
[ 5 ] (1%)
6 - Simpson
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
7 - Buckley
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
8 - Kreuzer
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
9 - Cripps
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
10 - Watson
[ 0 ] (0%)
11 - Warnock
[ 0 ] (0%)
12 - Boekhorst
[ 16 ] (3.2%)
13 - Yarran
[ 6 ] (1.2%)
14 - Jones
[ 0 ] (0%)
15 - Docherty
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow
[ 0 ] (0%)
17 - Rowe
[ 15 ] (3%)
18 - Jaksch
[ 15 ] (3%)
19 - Giles
[ 0 ] (0%)
20 - Holman
[ 7 ] (1.4%)
21 - Sheehan
[ 4 ] (0.8%)
22 - Tutt
[ 1 ] (0.2%)
23 - Henderson
[ 3 ] (0.6%)
24 - Whiley
[ 3 ] (0.6%)
25 - Smith
[ 0 ] (0%)
26 - Foster
[ 0 ] (0%)
27 - Armfield
[ 19 ] (3.8%)
28 - Bell
[ 16 ] (3.2%)
29 - Gowers
[ 0 ] (0%)
30 - Johnson
[ 0 ] (0%)
31 - Dick
[ 1 ] (0.2%)
32 - Graham
[ 20 ] (4%)
33 - Everitt
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
34 - Walsh
[ 1 ] (0.2%)
35 - Curnow
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
36 - Wood
[ 12 ] (2.4%)
37 - Fields
[ 0 ] (0%)
38 - Byrne
[ 7 ] (1.4%)
39 - Thomas
[ 19 ] (3.8%)
40 - Jamison
[ 22 ] (4.4%)
41 - Casboult
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
42 - Tuohy
[ 23 ] (4.6%)
43 - White
[ 14 ] (2.8%)
44 - Carrazzo
[ 6 ] (1.2%)
46 - Ellard
[ 0 ] (0%)
47 - Russell
[ 0 ] (0%)

Total Members Voted: 22

Topic: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) (Read 176161 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 4 (Wooden spoon certainties? 1-7)

Reply #255 –
Between the possibles and probables I had Byrne in for White. Bit of a call after one game but one has to take something on trust.

Wood was unlucky as i believe he and Casboult have done a good job in the ruck, as the stoppage figures would indicate, but it's either Wood or Kreuzer, not both.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 4 (Wooden spoon certainties? 1-7)

Reply #256 –
Amazingly tough after the first dozen or so, and in that dozen are some dinosaurs, the bulk of the list is crape and what talent they might have had is being beaten out of them by an archaic game plan and finger pointing development coaches!
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #257 –
OK, we've got a new coach and a new found energy. A lot of changes in form as well.

Here are the results from the last poll.

Starters
2 - Menzel - 11 (4.7%)
3 - Murphy - 11 (4.7%)
4 - Gibbs - 11 (4.7%)
5 - Judd - 11 (4.7%)
6 - Simpson - 11 (4.7%)
13 - Yarran - 11 (4.7%)
15 - Docherty - 11 (4.7%)
23 - Henderson - 11 (4.7%)
28 - Bell - 11 (4.7%)
8 - Kreuzer - 10 (4.2%)
9 - Cripps - 10 (4.2%)
33 - Everitt - 10 (4.2%)
35 - Curnow - 10 (4.2%)

Probables
17 - Rowe - 9 (3.8%)
40 - Jamison - 9 (3.8%)
38 - Byrne - 8 (3.4%)
42 - Tuohy - 7 (3%)
43 - White - 7 (3%)
1 - Walker - 7 (3%)

Possibly
36 - Wood - 6 (2.5%)
39 - Thomas - 6 (2.5%)
7 - Buckley - 5 (2.1%)
27 - Armfield - 5 (2.1%)
18 - Jaksch - 5 (2.1%)
21 - Sheehan - 5 (2.1%)
41 - Casboult - 5 (2.1%)
44 - Carrazzo - 4 (1.7%)

Probably not
22 - Tutt - 3 (1.3%)
32 - Graham - 2 (0.8%)
25 - Smith - 2 (0.8%)
24 - Whiley - 1 (0.4%)
46 - Ellard - 1 (0.4%)

Unlikely
10 - Watson - 0 (0%)
11 - Warnock - 0 (0%)
12 - Boekhorst - 0 (0%)
14 - Jones - 0 (0%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow - 0 (0%)
19 - Giles - 0 (0%)
20 - Holman - 0 (0%)
26 - Foster - 0 (0%)
29 - Gowers - 0 (0%)
30 - Johnson - 0 (0%)
31 - Dick - 0 (0%)
34 - Walsh - 0 (0%)
37 - Fields - 0 (0%)
47 - Russell - 0 (0%)

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #259 –
That was relatively easy, until I got to around 17-18.  We don't have a lot of talent in our bottom 6-8 players.
"Negative waves are not helpful. Try saying something righteous and hopeful instead." Oddball

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #260 –
Quote from: DJC – on
That was relatively easy, until I got to around 17-18.  We don't have a lot of talent in our bottom 6-8 players.

I think you need to recount your votes. I think you only chose 20 players.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #261 –
Quote from: kruddler – on
I think you need to recount your votes. I think you only chose 20 players.

You're right.  I have to find a coin to help me decide on the last two  :)
"Negative waves are not helpful. Try saying something righteous and hopeful instead." Oddball
 

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #262 –
Quote from: DJC – on
You're right.  I have to find a coin to help me decide on the last two  :)

Everitt would be one i'd choose without the need of a coin.

Daisy/Menzel/Walker...

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #263 –
Well that's a funny start to a poll. ???
Consensus ;)

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #264 –
I tried to put 23 in there but got caught...lol

I left Walker and Daisy out too due to fitness concerns and injury respectively.

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #265 –
Quote from: kruddler – on
Everitt would be one i'd choose without the need of a coin.

Daisy/Menzel/Walker...

Everitt definitely, Menzel and Walker is a toin coss.

However, it's academic because I can't get back to the voting page.  Any tips?
"Negative waves are not helpful. Try saying something righteous and hopeful instead." Oddball

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #266 –
After a quick look, my 4 main points of difference are;

In; Walker, Thomas
Out, Wood, Carrazzo

I went small and only included Kreuzer and Casboult as rucks.
I'm assuming (as dangerous as that is) Carrazzo will probably retire at the end of this year.
Mens sana in corpore sano - A healthy mind in a healthy body.

Navy, it's not just a color, it's an attitude !!!

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #267 –
Quote from: DJC – on
Everitt definitely, Menzel and Walker is a toin coss.

However, it's academic because I can't get back to the voting page.  Any tips?

Yeah, make sure you've got 22 before you hit enter next time.  :P

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #268 –
Quote from: kruddler – on
Yeah, make sure you've got 22 before you hit enter next time.  :P

Counting was never my strong point  :P
"Negative waves are not helpful. Try saying something righteous and hopeful instead." Oddball

Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 5 (Barkers Bunch 3-10)

Reply #269 –
Quote from: DJC – on
Counting was never my strong point  :P

Thats why i posted the 'magnetic board' link.

If you know the positions (i'm assuming you do), then you don't need to count them. ;)