Skip to main content
Topic: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble) (Read 57987 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #151
I wasn't arguing that the approach is a raging success  :))

But I think it is a better path than thinking a few games here and there being lost, but providing experience to young players is a good thing. Yes a young player will get 100 minutes of football. But in a side that he knows is not serious about winning. Seems a good way for players to then play for themselves and not the team. It creates self preservation and entitlement.

But who said the side wouldn't be serious about winning? You are serious every time you go out regardless of players picked. You are not focusing on losing by picking the kids, you are focusing on development, which is what a rebuild is.

Quote
GWS and GC both had lists of young players and indeed were stacked to the gills with them. GWS have however put some more experience in, and not put too much store in a Gary Ablett type to generate success. It may be working as GC seem to be demonstrating some problems that comes from a bunch of talented juniors getting games and then not progressing and

GC are struggling because they made a terrible decision at board level, much like us. GWS are progressing because they went with the kids early (whether by choice is up for debate) but the fact remains that those kids have now played around 60-70 games each and are ready to blossom. Getting the games into those kids, collectively, will make all the difference in the long run, whereas having lost all those games badly early will have made no difference at all.

Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #152
You have failed to grasp the concept of a rebuild.

You still don't get it.

If you take a bunch of privileged rich kids, stick them in a prison with hardened criminals. Will they come out of it the same?

The environment of the club is having a detrimental effect on our players, staff and definitely the members/supporters.

Melbourne were tanking playing kids and everyone knew it....including the players. It bred a bad culture. A losing culture. Some of these kids wanted out as a result. Tom Scully being your #1 on that list! Roos is still trying to change that. No matter how many high draft picks they get, they are still trying to shake their past.

What we want to build or rebuild is our determination/confidence/integrity as much as our playing list. We need to rebuild our culture. Play players who play for the team. Get some wins. Introduce kids sparingly, be careful not to overload them (remember Kreuzer?) but reward effort!

Rebuilding is more than getting games into some kids.

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #153
But that is a major part of it. There's nothing to say you are not creating a winning culture just by going with the kids. That argument is just silly. You're effectively trying to deflect from what we're talking about here by trying to label it 'tanking'. There is a huge difference, but I'm sure you know that.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #154
You still don't get it.

If you take a bunch of privileged rich kids, stick them in a prison with hardened criminals. Will they come out of it the same?

The environment of the club is having a detrimental effect on our players, staff and definitely the members/supporters.

Melbourne were tanking playing kids and everyone knew it....including the players. It bred a bad culture. A losing culture. Some of these kids wanted out as a result. Tom Scully being your #1 on that list! Roos is still trying to change that. No matter how many high draft picks they get, they are still trying to shake their past.

What we want to build or rebuild is our determination/confidence/integrity as much as our playing list. We need to rebuild our culture. Play players who play for the team. Get some wins. Introduce kids sparingly, be careful not to overload them (remember Kreuzer?) but reward effort!

Rebuilding is more than getting games into some kids.


Well said.

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #155
You still don't get it.

If you take a bunch of privileged rich kids, stick them in a prison with hardened criminals. Will they come out of it the same?

The environment of the club is having a detrimental effect on our players, staff and definitely the members/supporters.

Melbourne were tanking playing kids and everyone knew it....including the players. It bred a bad culture. A losing culture. Some of these kids wanted out as a result. Tom Scully being your #1 on that list! Roos is still trying to change that. No matter how many high draft picks they get, they are still trying to shake their past.

What we want to build or rebuild is our determination/confidence/integrity as much as our playing list. We need to rebuild our culture. Play players who play for the team. Get some wins. Introduce kids sparingly, be careful not to overload them (remember Kreuzer?) but reward effort!

Rebuilding is more than getting games into some kids.


Precisely.

It's a balancing act. Culture is imperative, critical. The Pagan years and Kreuzer Cup just about ruined our culture... it's a long road back from there.

If playing loads of kids is a recipe for success then why didn't GWS and Suns rip the league a new one from the get go? Successful club introduce newbies gradually and hopefully into a winning culture so they run out each week expecting to win, knowing how to win, understanding winning and what it takes. Introducing a newbie too early is a good way to crush his enthusiasm. Better a bloke has a week or two too many in the Magoos than come into senior footy too early - that's in an ideal world of minimal injuries and a great culture. We're creating a new culture and getting it right now is incredibly critical to our success in two, five ...ten years time.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #156
It's a recipe for success for the future, not the present. Not rocket science.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #157
Either way you spin it, the coach has failed dismally. No getting around that. Whatever he's trying to do, it's not working. I'm sure any rational person can clearly see that.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #158
But that is a major part of it. There's nothing to say you are not creating a winning culture just by going with the kids. That argument is just silly. You're effectively trying to deflect from what we're talking about here by trying to label it 'tanking'. There is a huge difference, but I'm sure you know that.

Its about competition for spots.   Makes everyone raise the bar eventually.

It's taking a lot longer with us, but this year our Vfl team has more players from our afl team playing starring roles than any other year before save for when Teague was here.

Either way, factors such as age shouldn't be a reason to gift games to people.

Playing for this footy club is a privilege to be earned.

Step one is being recruited.  Step two is earning a game.  some have a harder road than others due to what is in front of them for a game.

Sometimes we can't figure it out, so we hope there is a rational explanation behind selection.

Choosing players based on merit is the only recipe for success.  Where it gets precarious is what everyone understands as merit.  What you and I see and what the player actually does can be very different and I expect the mc have various instructions they expect to be upheld.  
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #159
Either way you spin it, the coach has failed dismally. No getting around that. Whatever he's trying to do, it's not working. I'm sure any rational person can clearly see that.

Seems most rational people believe he aint got the cattle and the club's something of a cot case... in fact most rational people seem to believe that sticking with MM is the sensible thing to do. Can't say I agree with it, but that is the overwhelming opinion in the footy fraternity.
Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #160
Was watching the game tonight and they had Swallow miked up. Was a good insight into the guy. I would love them to mike up Murph next Friday night. I would like o get a real insight into what he is like out on the ground. Just putting it out there.
2017-16th
2018-Wooden Spoon
2019-16th
2020-dare to dream? 11th is better than last I suppose
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #161
Seems most rational people believe he aint got the cattle and the club's something of a cot case... in fact most rational people seem to believe that sticking with MM is the sensible thing to do. Can't say I agree with it, but that is the overwhelming opinion in the footy fraternity.

Are you talking about the footy media or actual football people?

The media nuffies rarely say the coach has to go, in fact they never do.

They just speculate .

Actual footy people I talk to reckon he's stuck in his ways and unable to adapt to the modern game.
You can fool some of the people some of the time.......................................

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #162
Competition for spots... It's not exactly a hot competiton.

This is one of our best and most experienced teams. No excuses.
"We are a club in a hurry"

#united #reset

 

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #163
It's a recipe for success for the future, not the present. Not rocket science.

Sucess in the future can only be possible if a team starts to conduct itself in the way that it wants to be right now. Playing the kids is the mantra of the loser. It says we are not good enough now, so we hope that by gaining experience we will somehow get better. In a team sport that is a recipe for continued poor results. It nurtures an environment where losing in the present is acceptable in the hope that tomorrow will be better.

Know what?  Tomorrow never comes and losing begets losing. And bringing in ill prepared young players to such a mix retards their development. Senior players figure they can coast along as the team is in rebuild mode, and first round picks figure they get a game cause they 'need experience' but never fully grasp the level of commitment required to earn selection on merit. So let's all lose together and explain it away.

The best footy teams (like any succesful team in any walk of life) hate losing and are filthy about it when they do. It's great to learn from mistakes but once losing is acceptable for a team then the rot has set in and it spirals down. And the exchange of a team losing a few games for the gain of getting experience into individuals is a lousy trade off.

Anyway, rant over. Hoping for a good performance against the Giants. If our midfield work hard enough we may get a decent spread and some clean ball forward. We saw a couple of glimpses last week when this happened.

Re: RD 7 : Blues V Giants (Pre-Match Pre-Amble)

Reply #164
Sucess in the future can only be possible if a team starts to conduct itself in the way that it wants to be right now. Playing the kids is the mantra of the loser. It says we are not good enough now, so we hope that by gaining experience we will somehow get better. In a team sport that is a recipe for continued poor results. It nurtures an environment where losing in the present is acceptable in the hope that tomorrow will be better.

But then there's GWS that proves all that wrong. Losses in the past mean absolutely nothing once those boys get 80+ games into them.

Quote
Know what?  Tomorrow never comes and losing begets losing. And bringing in ill prepared young players to such a mix retards their development. Senior players figure they can coast along as the team is in rebuild mode, and first round picks figure they get a game cause they 'need experience' but never fully grasp the level of commitment required to earn selection on merit. So let's all lose together and explain it away.

That is a wishy washy argument based on assumption. Senior players feel they can coast? You're just clutching at straws now.

Quote
The best footy teams (like any succesful team in any walk of life) hate losing and are filthy about it when they do. It's great to learn from mistakes but once losing is acceptable for a team then the rot has set in and it spirals down. And the exchange of a team losing a few games for the gain of getting experience into individuals is a lousy trade off.

Once again, GWS proves this wrong. But also, once again you're assuming that teams will constantly lose when they pick the kids. St Kilda and Footscray are two examples in the current season that have bucked the trend, and when you look at our form, we could do not much worse.

Quote
Anyway, rant over. Hoping for a good performance against the Giants. If our midfield work hard enough we may get a decent spread and some clean ball forward. We saw a couple of glimpses last week when this happened.

I think we should account for GWS with this side myself, but if we play blokes like Boeky and Nick Graham we can still win and get these young blokes playing together for another game which will be of great importance down the track.

Get Mick away from this list before he does any further damage.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!