Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: "Coaching To Win" VS "Playing For The Future"  (Read 27513 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: "Coaching To Win" VS "Playing For The Future"

Reply #45 –
A coach must both coach for the win and have an eye on the future. When a team plays poorly, he must focus more on building. When it's winning, he sticks to the formula that's earning the victories. So, what's wrong with building in our situation?

Re: "Coaching To Win" VS "Playing For The Future"

Reply #46 –
Quote from: cimm1979 – on
Might add a year or so for talls, but yeah, seems about right.

Good players can have form slumps but those that tease and tease and tease really need to be screwed off.

Jordan Russellesque.

Mind you no one should be given a game, and thats where it all falls over.

These guys as much as everyone thinks they are holding up developement, are putting pressure on the youngsters to earn a game, and that cannot be a bad thing.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: "Coaching To Win" VS "Playing For The Future"

Reply #47 –
Quote from: Thryleon – on
Mind you no one should be given a game, and thats where it all falls over.

These guys as much as everyone thinks they are holding up developement, are putting pressure on the youngsters to earn a game, and that cannot be a bad thing.

It's a bad thing when you consider we need to expedite the development of these youngsters by playing them collectively as many times as possible, which is what a rebuild is all about.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!