Skip to main content
Topic: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) (Read 797552 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3570
The Democrats appear to have stumbled on a slogan that's cutting through; "Weird"

I suspect that many marketing types are wringing their hands ...
It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3571
Trump's trying to up his social media profile to counter Harris in the under 30 demographic, but he's doing it using "Truth Social", that is like lecturing to a retirement village about the value of false teeth.

They tried to put some Trump messaging on Tik Tok, it's like that Uncle that makes everybody uncomfortable being left in the room alone with the babies! FFS, he's the antithesis of what Gen Z females think a male should be, no wonder Weird works! ;D
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3572
Most lefties think Trump has lost every debate he has been in but he actually did get slaughtered today.

Harris poked the bear and he just lost the plot.
2012 HAPPENED!!!!!!!

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3573
I've heard it was a 0-0 draw.

Realistically you wouldn't vote for Trump over Harris on trumps track record.  All she has to do is play everything with a straight bat and she'll win u less the people in America are really dumb.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3574
I've heard it was a 0-0 draw.

Realistically you wouldn't vote for Trump over Harris on trumps track record.  All she has to do is play everything with a straight bat and she'll win u less the people in America are really dumb.

It'll depend on the media outlet as to how they report the result.

Having watched it,I thought she won it easily.
She unsettled him with a few comments that hit his ego.
The areas where he should have been strong, such as the border control he seemed to lose focus, and go off on a tangent or make some bizarre claims.

But your last point, about the intelligence of the nation, means nothing is certain.

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3575
Think back to how Aurangzeb monstered Hillary Clinton in 2016 to see how well Harris's team prepped her for this debate.  Still, it shouldn't be too difficult to get the better of an extreme narcissist with cognitive decline.

There were plenty of low points but it's hard to go past:

"In Springfield, they [immigrants from Haiti] are eating the dogs. The people that came in, they are eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there."

Sadly, Aurangzeb and Vance aren't backing away from this baseless claim but, then, Aurangzeb said that he saw it on TV so it must be true.

It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3576
I've heard it was a 0-0 draw.

Realistically you wouldn't vote for Trump over Harris on trumps track record.  All she has to do is play everything with a straight bat and she'll win u less the people in America are really dumb.

In footy terms, it was an 8 goal thumping.

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3577
Their system is pretty unique.
Early polls don't show a lot of movement...yet.
But it's not the percentages that count.
It's winning the states and the electoral college votes that go with them.

She's getting well ahead in Michigan and Wisconsin. If she get Pennsylvania and there no way Trump wins as it will get her exactly the required 270. It is close there with Harris about 1% in front on the averages fo the many polls there.

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3578
Zinger quote from Donald 

"I don't need to do a second debate, because I won the first won so easily"......

LOL

Perhaps Michael Voss could say there's no need for CFC to play in the Semi-finals, seeing as we were so dominant in the Elimination Final......
This is now the longest premiership drought in the history of the Carlton Football Club - more evidence of climate change?

 

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3579
So today there are reports Trump has come out and used social media to launch veiled threats at Taylor Swift for apparently endorsing Harris.

Trump is a bigger nutter than anybody in political history, he should be jailed for what he writes on his closed platform.
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3580
Another classic moment came when Aurangzeb was asked whether, after railing against Obamacare for a decade, he had a plan to replace it:

"I have a concept of a plan..."
It's still the Gulf of Mexico, Don Old!

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3581
Think back to how Aurangzeb monstered Hillary Clinton in 2016 to see how well Harris's team prepped her for this debate.  Still, it shouldn't be too difficult to get the better of an extreme narcissist with cognitive decline.

There were plenty of low points but it's hard to go past:

"In Springfield, they [immigrants from Haiti] are eating the dogs. The people that came in, they are eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there."

Sadly, Aurangzeb and Vance aren't backing away from this baseless claim but, then, Aurangzeb said that he saw it on TV so it must be true.

Just watch out for this one.
There was a video of an Ohio nutter who killed and started eating a cat.
She's not an immigrant. She's just mentally ill.
...but I've seen it used on a site as an example of Trump's claim


Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3582
I wouldn't vote for either party, but the GOP can't even be bothered challenging their audience with something original, instead resorting to the old "dog eating" trope, straight out of the Asian slander playbook.

I really don't understand how people can watch even 30 seconds of that sh1te. It's purely performative, the triumph of spectacle over anything of substance, and another step in the seemingly limitless degradation of public discourse and the political process. 

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3583
I really don't understand how people can watch even 30 seconds of that sh1te. It's purely performative, the triumph of spectacle over anything of substance, and another step in the seemingly limitless degradation of public discourse and the political process.

I don't think folks watch it for any reason other than the spectacle.
If you have an interest in politics, how it works, how it can be manipulated and how it can influence our lives... you watch.
It not about who has the best policies, it's about who performs best because in the end policy counts for absolutely nothing unless you win the election.
You can have the best policies in the world, but if you're not in a position to implement them, they're useless.

In my opinion Harris won the debate clearly.
Do we know a lot more about her policies and how they would differ from Biden's
Nope.
She was a bit vague, using some 'facts' out of context, but not as many as Trump who basically told a few 'porkies.'
What we do know is that she stood toe to toe with Trump and more than matched him.
So in terms of the election it must have had some benefit however minimal.
Does that matter to us?
Of course it does.
Like it or not what happens in the USA affects us and the rest of the world.
America would be very different places under Trump as opposed to Harris.

Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading)

Reply #3584
Just watch out for this one.
There was a video of an Ohio nutter who killed and started eating a cat.
She's not an immigrant. She's just mentally ill.
...but I've seen it used on a site as an example of Trump's claim
They freely allow guns in the USA, and hunting just about anything is largely unrestricted in some areas, I have US associates who regale me with stories about walking out there backdoor on suburban fringes to go deer hunting on foot, lying in wait in camouflage gear with hunting rifles just a few hundred metres off a normal suburban street.

Apparently, the pet eating trope was partially triggered when some nutter used an AI altered images / video of a local carrying birds caught legally via trapping / hunting. The person who was filmed carrying the birds has come out to expose that lie already but the media don't broadcast the correction. He may now sue and he should be within his rights to do so.

In both cases I believe they were locals, as in US citizens, they were not illegal immigrants.
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"