Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption (Read 22624 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #45 –
Our key defenders in Rowe & Plowman have had 3 hand passes between them that's all. Need some serious second half efforts

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #46 –
We played better against Hawks, Sydney and West Coast.

Saints probably have more to prove they're in third year of re build and push for finals next season. The season as a whole has been encouraging

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #47 –
Based on the performance of the ones and the twos, either someone forgot to wipe the whiteboard with the proposed delisters for 2017 still on it or they had a collective meeting and were told. 

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #48 –
Quote from: pinot – on
We played better against Hawks, Sydney and West Coast.

Saints probably have more to prove they're in third year of re build and push for finals next season. The season as a whole has been encouraging

Always learn ugly wins are way better for you than honorable losses. Two awful ugly wins against Freo and Essendon kickstarted our season as it gave us belief, the close results against Hawthorn and Sydney did nothing as, while encouraging didn't provide that winning belief. A win is a win no matter how you get it and it always helps.

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #49 –
Getting worse , really no effort & desire from many , we were robbed on the goal , ball went through for a point for sure

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #50 –
Quote from: townsendcalling – on
Based on the performance of the ones and the twos, either someone forgot to wipe the whiteboard with the proposed delisters for 2017 still on it or they had a collective meeting and were told.
Interesting thought , nothing would surprise me, certainly playing like it

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #51 –
Wtf was that review being deemed a goal
-
Clearly went thru the behind!

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #52 –
Quote from: Robblues – on
Our key defenders in Rowe & Plowman have had 3 hand passes between them that's all. Need some serious second half efforts

Our ruckmen have 5 touches and 1 mark between them. We continue to go with a structure that failed us in the first 4 rounds, what's wrong with the structure that won us games. Match committee, dumb as dog crape. We played our best footy when Phillips was injured. Kreuzer and Casboult became much better players. Now we play 2 ruck and one key forward again and 3 players suddenly turn to crape, which is alot out of 18.

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #53 –
Thought the same MickyO , can't bel I've that one

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #54 –
Goodbye Buckley and casboult.

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #55 –
Saints have so many loose players, we are just not working hard enough, simply as that

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #56 –
Absolute training drill stuff, disgusting effort today second rate. And when they have chances to goal they convert

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #58 –
Nice goal 2E 3 rd for the game, from HBF , and our forwards contribution?
 

Re: Rd 20: In game prozac consumption

Reply #59 –
Buckley.... Spud.  Delist.
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?