Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #30 – April 23, 2019, 09:21:17 pm :thanks Lods, this is a thread I follow as I think it is one of the statistical measures that actually means something. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #31 – April 23, 2019, 09:35:11 pm Quote from: Professer E – on April 23, 2019, 09:21:17 pm :thanks Lods, this is a thread I follow as I think it is one of the statistical measures that actually means something.Agree, thanks Lods! Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #32 – April 29, 2019, 11:40:37 pm After Round 62017 Goals-63 Behinds-58 Percentage 74.8 % (For- 436, Against- 583)2018 Goals-57 Behinds - 54Percentage 66.3 % (For- 396, Against- 597)2019(Target 2018-Goals 192- Behinds 201- For 1353)Goals- 66 Behinds -60Percentage 93.6% (For 456, Against 487)Goalkickers (Target 2018- Charlie Curnow 34-20 -224)2017Casboult 11Wright 10Silvagni 62018C. Curnow 10Wright 9Casboult 9Garlett 5McKay 5Fisher- 52019McKay 11McGovern 10E Curnow 6Casboult 4Fisher 4A couple of better goalkicking efforts and we’re now moving well ahead of last years ‘points for’.Defence is still over 100 points better than the same time last year.Despite the loss our percentage actually improved fractionally over last week.We’d have to look at the total goalkicking list to the same stage but we seem to have increased our spread of goalkickers. Last year most of our goals at this stage seemed to have come from just half a dozen players.Numerology for this week …In 2017 our three leading goalkickers had 11, 10 and 6 respectively.in 2019 our three leading goalkickers had 11, 10 and 6 respectively. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #33 – May 09, 2019, 11:14:53 pm After Round 72016Goals 69 Behinds 73Percentage 79.6 % (For 487, Against 612)2017 Goals 75 Behinds 65Percentage 80.6 % (For- 515, Against- 639)2018 Goals-67 Behinds - 64Percentage 64.5 % (For- 466, Against- 722)2019(Target 2018-Goals 192- Behinds 201- For 1353)Goals 74 Behinds 74Percentage 85.3% (For-518, Against 607)Goalkickers (Target 2018- Charlie Curnow 34-20 -224)2017Casboult 13Wright 12Weitering 6Silvagni 62018Casboult 11Curnow 10Wright 10McKay 7Garlett 5Fisher- 52019McKay 11McGovern 10E Curnow 7Cripps 5A bad loss can put a big dent in your percentage when your 'For and Against' is around the 500/600 mark. We lost over 8% last weekend. That’s still well ahead of our percentage at the same stage last season.Our two goalkicking leaders didn’t add to their tally…it would have been extremely difficult for McGovern to advance.It’s interesting the similarity between our 2017 and 2019 –‘Points For’ with only 3 points separating them.Nothing much else of interest there. Our attack and defence both remain ahead of last year.The more you look at it the poorer last season looks (particularly in defence) in comparison to the other years of the rebuild which have been pretty stable from a statistical point of view.Numerology-Our Goals and Behind Tally for this season is the same 74. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #34 – May 14, 2019, 03:09:27 pm After Round 82016Goals 83 Behinds 82- (For 580 against 703)Percentage 82.5 %2017 Goals 85 Behinds 71- (For 581 against 724)Percentage 80.3 %2018Goals-81 Behinds - 71Percentage 69.6 % (For- 557, Against- 800)2019(Target 2018-Goals 192- Behinds 201- For 1353)Goals 87 Behinds 83Percentage 84.9% (For 605 Against 713)Goalkickers (Target 2018- Charlie Curnow 34-20 -224)2017Casboult 13Wright 12Silvagni 8Weitering 72018Curnow 13Casboult 11Wright 10McKay 9Fisher- 6Garlett 52019McGovern 13McKay 13E Curnow 7Cripps 6Dropped just a fraction in percentage.On the positive side, in the last few weeks, we’ve now moved ahead of our ‘Points For’ for the previous 3 seasons.The Points Against which was at one stage more than 100 points better than last year has suffered a bit, with injuries disrupting the backline, and has now slipped under the 100 point mark.Numerology-our leading goalkicker to the end of Round 8 has had 13 goals for each of the last 3 years (this year we have 2 of them though ) Quote Selected Last Edit: May 14, 2019, 03:12:13 pm by Lods
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #35 – May 14, 2019, 04:38:04 pm Compared to the rest of the comp we've gone from 17th last year to 13th this year (for goals scored). Not a massive improvement - but we'll take it. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #36 – May 14, 2019, 09:46:05 pm It’s good to see McGovern having scoreboard impact. I think he is getting better with every game but the fact that he can score from limited possessions is a good sign.It’s also a good sign that Cripps is impacting the scoreboard, we just need a couple of other mids to start scoring consistently.I suspect that Charlie’s name will appear among our leading goal kickers in the next week or two and I’m looking forward to that This analysis makes so much more sense than the 4 from 40 tripe. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #37 – May 14, 2019, 10:12:12 pm Quote from: DJC – on May 14, 2019, 09:46:05 pmIt’s good to see McGovern having scoreboard impact. I think he is getting better with every game but the fact that he can score from limited possessions is a good sign.It’s also a good sign that Cripps is impacting the scoreboard, we just need a couple of other mids to start scoring consistently.I suspect that Charlie’s name will appear among our leading goal kickers in the next week or two and I’m looking forward to that This analysis makes so much more sense than the 4 from 40 tripe.He's quality, no questionHarry and Charlie should give the guy space - and drag defenders away....one on one Guv beats anyone (noting I said the same about Charlie last year). Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #38 – May 14, 2019, 10:35:53 pm Quote from: flyboy77 – on May 14, 2019, 10:12:12 pmHe's quality, no questionHarry and Charlie should give the guy space - and drag defenders away....one on one Guv beats anyone (noting I said the same about Charlie last year).Our forward line is very much a work in progress and Charlie and the Gov missing game’s didn’t help. It’s going to click before long and Lods’ goaltracker could blow a boiler Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #39 – May 20, 2019, 03:30:47 pm After Round 92016Goals 89 Behinds 92-(For 626 against 816)Percentage 76.7 %2017 Goals 92 Behinds 80-(For 632 against 810)Percentage 78 %2018 Goals-88 Behinds - 79Percentage 63.3 % (For- 607, Against- 959)2019(Target 2018-Goals 192- Behinds 201- For 1353)Goals-94 Behinds- 86Percentage 76.4% (For-650, Against- 851)Goalkickers ((Target 2018- Charlie Curnow 34-20 -224)2017Casboult 15Wright 12Silvagni 8Weitering 72018Curnow 13McKay 11Casboult 11Wright 10Fisher- 72019McKay 16-13-109McGovern 14-4-88E Curnow 8Cripps 6J Silvagni 6The percentage took a bit of a beating this week. Down to 76.4 from a high of 93.6 after round 6.McKay and McGovern now tracking ahead of the top 2 from previous seasons.We didn’t get as badly knocked about in the points ‘For and Against’ comparison this week as we might have expected. That’s because in Round 9 last year Melbourne beat us 25-9-159 to 7-8-50.Rather amazing that over the 4 years we track there is only a 7 goal difference in our ‘Points For’ For and apart from the ‘aberration last year about the same in our ‘Points Against.’ Quote Selected Last Edit: May 20, 2019, 03:32:30 pm by Lods
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #40 – May 20, 2019, 08:42:45 pm Begs the question, have we actually improved at all? Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #41 – May 20, 2019, 08:46:32 pm Quote from: Jack Burton – on May 20, 2019, 08:42:45 pmBegs the question, have we actually improved at all?Getting rid of 14 or so players every off season for 3 years has a cumulative effect. It's like resetting every time. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #42 – May 20, 2019, 09:36:21 pm Quote from: Jack Burton – on May 20, 2019, 08:42:45 pmBegs the question, have we actually improved at all?Not under Bolton. Side is better but he' getting nothing out of them. Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #43 – May 21, 2019, 07:56:38 am Quote from: PaulP – on May 20, 2019, 08:46:32 pmGetting rid of 14 or so players every off season for 3 years has a cumulative effect. It's like resetting every time.Yes that is a reality fans won't accept, yet if you point out they feel negative in the same cumulative way they enter denial!Gratification is instant, bitterness lingers! Quote Selected
Re: Goaltracker 2019 Reply #44 – May 21, 2019, 09:19:33 am Quote from: LP – on May 21, 2019, 07:56:38 amYes that is a reality fans won't accept, yet if you point out they feel negative in the same cumulative way they enter denial!Gratification is instant, bitterness lingers!Yes, it's a hard sell, the slow rebuild. Clearly media and certain supporters (and maybe others) are getting very fidgety. Quote Selected
Topic: Goaltracker 2019 (Read 25643 times)
previous topic - next topic
Topic: Goaltracker 2019 (Read 25643 times)
previous topic - next topic