Skip to main content
Topic: General Discussions (Read 337555 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1995
Historically, power asymmetries have never been corrected voluntarily. There isn't one example that I can recall where those at the top cede power over a hot cocoa and marshmallows. Historically, their hand has always been forced. Lidia Thorpe is rough around the edges and doesn't mind crude tactics (or maybe doesn't know any better), but she does have a point. It's taken 200 years for First Nations voices to be even heard, and there's still plenty to do. Martin Luther King was correct when he said the arc of the moral universe is long.

This lack of a first nation's voice is really a bit of a myth.
First nations people have  a strong voice.  They don't always agree  and are not necessarily always listened to especially by political folk. If you dont think they have a voice then you haven't been paying attention.Indigenous departments are part of State and Federal  Govenments and contain many Indigenous people. We had Indigenous aides and teachers in my schools for the last 20 years of my teaching providing an Indigenous perspective.

The issues facing indigenous people are significant and complex. Is enough being done to address these real issues.? Certainly not!

And folks like Lidia Thorpe with her distractions are not helping the situation. She is divisive and alienates people. Of all the things she talked about yesterday none were solutions, just grievances and insults.


Re: General Discussions

Reply #1996
This lack of a first nation's voice is really a bit of a myth.
First nations people have  a strong voice.  They don't always agree  and are not necessarily always listened to especially by political folk. If you dont think they have a voice then you haven't been paying attention.Indigenous departments are part of State and Federal  Govenments and contain many Indigenous people. We had Indigenous aides and teachers in my schools for the last 20 years of my teaching providing an Indigenous perspective.

The issues facing indigenous people are significant and complex. Is enough being done to address these real issues.? Certainly not!

And folks like Lidia Thorpe with her distractions are not helping the situation. She is divisive and alienates people. Of all the things she talked about yesterday none were solutions, just grievances and insults.

If the powers that be are not listening and not acting, or listening and not acting, then it proves my point that First Nations people are still lacking power.

With your last paragraph, Americans said exactly the same about MLK, i.e that his civil rights demonstrations etc. hurt Negroes more than they helped. I'm not in any way suggesting that Thorpe is on par with MLK, but the comparison hardly flatters our generation.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1997
This lack of a first nation's voice is really a bit of a myth.
First nations people have  a strong voice.  They don't always agree  and are not necessarily always listened to especially by political folk. If you dont think they have a voice then you haven't been paying attention.Indigenous departments are part of State and Federal  Govenments and contain many Indigenous people. We had Indigenous aides and teachers in my schools for the last 20 years of my teaching providing an Indigenous perspective.

The issues facing indigenous people are significant and complex. Is enough being done to address these real issues.? Certainly not!

And folks like Lidia Thorpe with her distractions are not helping the situation. She is divisive and alienates people. Of all the things she talked about yesterday none were solutions, just grievances and insults.

If the powers that be are not listening and not acting, or listening and not acting, then it proves my point that First Nations people are still lacking power.

With your last paragraph, Americans said exactly the same about MLK, i.e that his civil rights demonstrations etc. hurt Negroes more than they helped. I'm not in any way suggesting that Thorpe is on par with MLK, but the comparison hardly flatters our generation.

Lidia Thorpes methods are the complete opposite of King's. Maybe she should take a leaf from that playbook.

(Oh...and King...well that's my generation) :D  :D

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1998

Lidia Thorpes methods are the complete opposite of King's. Maybe she should take a leaf from that playbook.

(Oh...and King...well that's my generation) :D  :D

Perhaps my earlier post lacked clarity. Whether Thorpe's methods are same or different to MLK is not really the point. MLK was the most hated man in America when he died, and the consensus position among surveyed Americans is that he was divisive and his methods counterproductive to the Negro cause, which is where the comparison to Thorpe comes in, or Adam Goodes for that matter.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #1999

Lidia Thorpes methods are the complete opposite of King's. Maybe she should take a leaf from that playbook.

(Oh...and King...well that's my generation) :D  :D

Perhaps my earlier post lacked clarity. Whether Thorpe's methods are same or different to MLK is not really the point. MLK was the most hated man in America when he died, and the consensus position among surveyed Americans is that he was divisive and his methods counterproductive to the Negro cause, which is where the comparison to Thorpe comes in, or Adam Goodes for that matter.

Do you really think history will judge Lidia Thorpe as Australia's equivalent of  MLK?

King was a leader of people. Thorpe seems to be only interested in her own profile.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #2000
Thorpe appears to be as disliked on her own side of politics as by the opposition.

I mentioned a long time ago that I fear many have lost their way, and when they become extreme they talk crap, then when they get called out for talking crap they claim it's institutionalised racism. This is straight out of Trump's play book, talk crap, then when they call you out for talking crap claim you are being persecuted and discriminated against.

I notice the NASCA board have come out and potted Thorpe today, declaring she doesn't speak for young indigenous Australians.
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: General Discussions

Reply #2001
Do you really think history will judge Lidia Thorpe as Australia's equivalent of  MLK?

King was a leader of people. Thorpe seems to be only interested in her own profile.

No, they're not equals. I don't think they're equals, and said as much in my previous post.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #2002
Attitudes (hatred and anger) like Thorpe's create wars not solve problems or achieve outcomes. The only thing she has in common with MLK is that she is of the same species (human), that's about it.
2021-Pi$$ or get off the pot
2022- Real Deal or more of the same? 0.6%
2023- "Raise the Standard" - M. Voss Another year wasted Bar Set
2024-Back to the drawing boardNo excuses, its time
2025-Carlton can win the 2025 AFL Premiership

Re: General Discussions

Reply #2003
Politicising race is almost racism defined.
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: General Discussions

Reply #2004
Two things today:

1) Mt Arapiles climbing ban - the possibility has been in the news for a while, however, one of the affected groups (the rock climbers) is saying that they weren't listened to.  Now it's going to be in place, what is it that is really aiming to be achieved?

2) Nazi Salute.  First Victorian sentenced, receives 1 month accommodation curtesy of the King.  The available sentencing options are (max) 12 mnths gaol, or $24k fine.  Fine would be paid by mates in no time, is gaol going to rehab the offender or harden their stance against authority (especially when they have no remorse).  Don't know the solution, but this doesn't feel right - is there a better way to address the issue? (The offender does get a criminal record, which makes it harder to get employment, but possibly more likely to be employed by same/similar minded people).

Thoughts?


Re: General Discussions

Reply #2005
Two things today:

1) Mt Arapiles climbing ban - the possibility has been in the news for a while, however, one of the affected groups (the rock climbers) is saying that they weren't listened to.  Now it's going to be in place, what is it that is really aiming to be achieved?

2) Nazi Salute.  First Victorian sentenced, receives 1 month accommodation curtesy of the King.  The available sentencing options are (max) 12 mnths gaol, or $24k fine.  Fine would be paid by mates in no time, is gaol going to rehab the offender or harden their stance against authority (especially when they have no remorse).  Don't know the solution, but this doesn't feel right - is there a better way to address the issue? (The offender does get a criminal record, which makes it harder to get employment, but possibly more likely to be employed by same/similar minded people).

Thoughts?


Id rather our wannabe Nazi do some work to pay back the community by doing some months of community work helping cleanup the area, removing graffiti, paint the local synagogue etc etc, sitting in some jail costing the rest of us money and just building up resentment wont change his/her attitude imho and at the end of their jail term we have another antisocial unemployable individual who will be more vulnerable to be recruited by these Neo Nazi type organizations.

Re: General Discussions

Reply #2006
Don't know much about the first one

On the Nazi salute.
I'm not sure whether jail time works in respect of banning the symbols of extreme right wing movements.

The much more effective approach is the financial one..,and make it really prohibitive in terms of cost.

In the end though with any penalty…
You're banning the symbolism, not the idea.
This guy won't change his mind.
He's a 'martyr' for the cause….and a committed one
In fact, with a jail term, he's more likely to find, not only sympathetic companions, but also some young minds looking for an identity and ready to be influenced.
While the outside proliferation of the salute may disappear, the people who embrace this culture and ideology won't be deterred at all by such bans.
It will be used in secret places and modified for public display.
It's probably the same with the swastika.
It’ll still make an appearance on a pretty regular basis.
People don’t normally draw these symbols in full public view.
Bizarrely a guy is in strife for displaying a swastika in an anti-Israel protest sign. He was making the point that the Israeli’s were engaging in a form of genocide reminiscent of the Nazi’s.

Thankfully the extremist views are very much in the minority.
It's probably not a great idea to give them too much oxygen.


Re: General Discussions

Reply #2007
In context with the current war Israel and Palestine, how do people see the nazi salute? 

Is it the same inflammatory symbol it was?

Personally I think now if I saw it, it has a more current context of "I am not standing for the persecution of the Palestinians" vs what it used to represent.

The Nazi Symbolism is almost 100 years old now, and whilst its always important not to minimise the holocaust, any anti Israel stance of today is not born out of the same stuff it was back then.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: General Discussions

Reply #2008
The situation in the Middle East is extremely complex.
We could go down a bit of a rabbit hole in terms of argument, so it's probably best to be a bit cautious in relation to a long standing conflict and history.
But in terms of Nazi symbols

Nazi symbolism is just what it is,
It's a tool of an organisation that persecuted and exterminated large groups of the European population at the time, not just Jewish people but communists, socialists, homosexuals, gypsies, political opponents etc
Anyone using those 'tools' aligns themselves with that level of hate and extremism.

And when you hate then "off goes your head and on goes a pumpkin". ;)


Re: General Discussions

Reply #2009
<deleted
DrE is no more... you ok with that harmonica man?