Re: God help me - the Test Cricket thread
Reply #698 –
I'm not a big fan of T20, and I do not follow it closely, but see enough stats to be completely puzzled by team selection. In particular, it's got me stuffed how Starc keeps getting a gig, he's a match winner one out of every 10 or so games, but the rest of the time he's on the other side of the ledger, is his father-in-law the selector? Maybe that unfair, in reality he's dead ordinary 60% of the time, wickless 40% of games, one wicket or less 60% of games, more than 8 an over 60% of games, more than 10 an over 40% of games.
I know he is an elite talent, but the old rules still apply, you are only as good as the bloke who bowls at the other end, and in this regard Starc is almost MIA 90% of the time!
So the CA answer to this conundrum is to apparently consider dropping Cummins!
The same people that boost Starc, want Finch and Maxwell kiboshed, and I agree they are inconsistent as well, yet they are an arm and a leg ahead of Starc in terms of consistency!
It's like an episode of The Twilight Zone! 
For me the missing ingredient is Alex Carey, I'd have had him and Wade in the squad, they could both play as batsmen outright.
I read that Pontin wants more batsmen, but that won't help when the main strike bowler goes at 10+ an over 90% of the time! Sure the averages suggest better, but that is the problem, they are averages, and a shizen two weeks with multiple loses gets made up for when he takes 5 for 10 off 3 overs to win us one game.