Re: 9/11 Debate
Reply #56 –
Some people have pre-existing medical conditions, that might make them extremely vulnerable to an infection like COVID-19, and some have pre-existing conditions that will mean they can never safely have a vaccine.
So you think they shouldn't protect themselves just to preserve your perception of freedom, it's an interesting insight into your perspective!
What's that got to do with me being required to wear a mask on public transport and at shops with less than 4 confirmed active cases in the state, and 0 community transmission for 18 days?
Mask wearing should no longer be mandatory. Before you debate this point, think hard about the impact of mandatory mask wearing with no threat. When people are required to wear them when needed you are going to get a much greater resistance because it reeks of an over reaction now, and it will be similar later
@Thryleon You are desperate now, I suppose you've committed to the the anti-vaccine push in blind faith like a fanatic, and can't see the truth that they save lives.
Please feel free to exercise your own freedom, in fact I would argue for your right to refuse the vaccines, but I don't support your right to hurt those around you by poisoning their view of the world with unfounded rhetoric.
Not an anti vaccer, so your point is moot, and your opinion of any rhetoric is irrelevant.
Think about what you're saying in context of a government that performed the atrocities of a holocaust. Should we trust everything we are being told or should we question everything? Its very easy to label someone to discredit them, but its very difficult to admit you might have it wrong. I might be wrong, it all might be legitimate but science points to many inconsistencies which makes me wonder, are we being lied to?
If covid was actually harmless and the stats deliberately muddied to allow a cover up, would we ever be told?