Jim Park Analysis 2021

Topic: Jim Park Analysis 2021 (Read 10451 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jim Park Analysis 2021

March 22, 2021, 09:12:34 pm

Welcome to the 2021 version of the Jim Park Analysis thread. Thank you to all those people who have voted already. I have already updated the spreadsheet, so thing will be ready.
At the moment, I expect to close the Voting thread for Round 1 on Thursday, as we play the Meat Pies on Thursday night. Just wish I could be there: Parent teacher interviews, via the web, no less. Pity I can't do that at the MCG!

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #1 – March 27, 2021, 11:36:08 am

Carlton vs Richmond: Rd 1 Nightmare:
We started the year as we have now for too long, with the loss to Richmond. I hate that.

Trends
[1]   The rating of 8.44 was very high for a loss, but for the most part we were the better team. A rating of 8.44 represents between a C+ and a B-. However, we had a much higher range than is usual, with ratings varying from A(!) to E(!!!). I guess a lot of voters took into account the team we were playing, while others were simply disgusted that we had another loss in a very similar manner.
[2]   We had 4 players score more than 100 Votes, with Weitering getting a 95. That suggests that we had a number of contributors.
[3]   We had 14 players get a mention this week, a positive sign. A couple more and the result …
[4]   We had 16 voters this week, which is quite high for a loss. It was 4 more than for the corresponding game last year.
[5]   Sam Walsh started the year in fantastic form to take out the first BOG. It was good to see Cripps in the votes as well, although he does seem to be carrying some injury issues at the moment.
[6]   Sam Walsh and Adam Saad got votes from every voter, the only players to do so. It was very good seeing new players in the votes.
[7]   Similarly, it was nice to get Fog and Oscar McDonald get into the votes in their first outings in our colours, even with the scores being small.
[8]   Pittonet was a very important player, as our sole ruckman available. Alas, a 1 vote performance suggests that he was well beaten on the night. As someone who thinks the rucks are important in getting our players first use of the ball, I saw this as a bad sign. So it proved in week 2.

Votes:
470 - Walsh, Sam (0)
275 - Saad, Adam (0)
164 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
109 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
95 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
59 - Newnes, Jack (0)
53 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
16 - Curnow, Edward (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
8 - Fisher, Zac (0)
6 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
3 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
3 - McKay, Harrison (0)
3 - Pittonet, Marc (0)

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #2 – April 05, 2021, 05:50:19 pm

Carlton vs Collingwood: Rd 2 Disappointment:
Most Carlton supporters were very disappointed with this game, as we didn't show the same intensity that we managed against Richmond for so much of that game. A huge disappointment and a question mark over our entire season.

Trends:
[1]   The rating this week is considerably lower than last week at 7.1. This represents a score of barely a D. Other than 2 F’s, most of the scores were around the D mark. There simply wasn’t the difference in the way we say the game. D for Disappointment!
[2]   Last week we had 4 guys who scores more than 100. This week there were only 3, although Gibbo did get 96. That appears to be a reasonable assessment: too much left to too few.
[3]   We had 13 players get a mention, only one down from last week. We tend to get nearer 19 when we win.
[4]   Last week we had 16 voters. This week we were down to 14, another typical result when we lose.
[5]   Adam Saad managed to get top votes this week, followed closely by Sam Walsh.
[6]   Adam Saad was the only player to get votes from every voter. Sam Walsh missed out on one, as did H.

This weeks votes:
Saad, Adam 253
Walsh, Sam 233
McKay, Harrison 172
Gibbons, Michael 96
Fogarty, Lachlan 76
Weitering, Jacob 73
Martin, Jack 68
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 23
Fisher, Zac 18
Docherty, Sam 18
William, Zac 15
Cripps, Patrick 13
Curnow, Edward 5

Progressive Voting:
703 - Walsh, Sam (0)
528 - Saad, Adam (0)
177 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
175 - McKay, Harrison (0)
169 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
150 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
109 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
82 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
59 - Newnes, Jack (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
21 - Curnow, Edward (0)
18 - Docherty, Sam (0)
16 - William, Zac (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
3 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
3 - Pittonet, Marc (0)

Sam Walsh and Adam Saad have already cleared away from the pack. It is close behind them.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #3 – April 09, 2021, 09:00:43 pm

AFL 2021 Rd 3:   Carlton vs Fremantle
And the Blues finally open their account for 2021. Missed it live but enjoyed a lot of the replay. It is amazing how different my brain chemistry is after a win!

Trends:
[1]   The rating this week is so much better than last week that the question about which Carlton team went onto the field almost becomes relevant. The overall rating was 9.19, which is almost a B+. Some of us are hard markers.
All of the ratings were from B- to A, nothing higher, nothing lower. That in itself is quite unusual, as we are a very varied bunch are rarely see the game the same way.

[2]   This week we have 5 players get 100 or more votes. That in itself is good, but the lowest of those 5 scores was 172! It showed that we had some dominant players who stuck out.

[3]   We still showed that we are a bunch of individuals: only 3 players got votes from all voters (Cripps, Jones and McKay). However, three other players had all but one or two voters give them a mention. This is extremely unusual for us when we vote.

[4]   This round there were 16 voters, which is a little down for a considerable win. We haven’t had many considerable wins in recent years. Hopefully, we can put away a few more teams this year.
We had 17 voters for this round last year.

[5]   We had 13 players get a mention this week, which is a little down on vote getters from recent times. I think it was because we had quite a number of dominant players who deserved a lot of votes, so the borderline cases missed out. There were a number of players who got Honourable Mentions, rather than votes this week.

[6]   Liam Jones got his first BOG of the season with a dominant display across half back. Sam Walsh made it 3 top 2 finishes out of 3. Only 2 others, Saad and Gibbons, have managed top 10 finishes in all 3 games this year.

[7]   Of our newer players, Fog has managed 11th, 5th and 5th. That is a pretty positive start for the young man.

Votes:
Jones, Liam 319
Walsh, Sam 270
McKay, Harrison 247
Cripps, Patrick 207
Fogarty, Lachlan 172
Silvagni, Jack 75
Gibbons, Michael 23
Docherty, Sam 17
Curnow, Edward 14
Saad, Adam 11
Newnes, Jack 9
Plowman, Lachlan 9
Pittonet, Marc 6

Progressive Votes:
973 - Walsh, Sam (0)
540 - Saad, Adam (0)
422 - McKay, Harrison (0)
383 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
319 - Jones, Liam (0)
254 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
172 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
169 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
117 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
78 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
67 - Newnes, Jack (0)
36 - Curnow, Edward (0)
35 - Docherty, Sam (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
16 - William, Zac (0)
9 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Sam Walsh has a commanding lead at this point, but the following pack is strong and improving.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #4 – April 10, 2021, 10:44:24 am

To be updated today. There was a late voter.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #5 – April 16, 2021, 10:28:40 am

AFL 2021 Rd 3:   Carlton vs Fremantle Updated 16th April
Sorry for the need of an update, but we had a late voter.

Trends:
[1]   The rating this week is so much better than last week that the question about which Carlton team went onto the field almost becomes relevant. The overall rating was 9.18, which is almost a B+. Some of us are hard markers.
All of the ratings were from B- to A, nothing higher, nothing lower. That in itself is quite unusual, as we are a very varied bunch are rarely see the game the same way.

[2]   This week we have 5 players get 100 or more votes. That in itself is good, but the lowest of those 5 scores was 173! It showed that we had some dominant players who stuck out.

[3]   We still showed that we are a bunch of individuals: only 3 players got votes from all voters (Cripps, Jones and McKay). However, three other players had all but one or two voters give them a mention. This is extremely unusual for us when we vote.

[4]   This round there were 17 voters, which is a little down for a considerable win. We haven’t had many considerable wins in recent years. Hopefully, we can put away a few more teams this year.
We had 17 voters for this round last year.

[5]   We had 13 players get a mention this week, which is a little down on vote getters from recent times. I think it was because we had quite a number of dominant players who deserved a lot of votes, so the borderline cases missed out. There were a number of players who got Honourable Mentions, rather than votes this week.

[6]   Liam Jones got his first BOG of the season with a dominant display across half back. Sam Walsh made it 3 top 2 finishes out of 3. Only 2 others, Saad and Gibbons, have managed top 10 finishes in all 3 games this year.

[7]   Of our newer players, Fog has managed 11th, 5th and 5th. That is a pretty positive start for the young man.

Votes:
Jones, Liam 305
Walsh, Sam 281
McKay, Harrison 248
Cripps, Patrick 216
Fogarty, Lachlan 173
Silvagni, Jack 70
Gibbons, Michael 22
Docherty, Sam 16
Curnow, Edward 13
Saad, Adam 11
Plowman, Lachlan 8
Newnes, Jack 8
Pittonet, Marc 5

Progressive Votes:
984 - Walsh, Sam (0)
539 - Saad, Adam (0)
424 - McKay, Harrison (0)
393 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
305 - Jones, Liam (0)
255 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
171 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
169 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
117 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
67 - Newnes, Jack (0)
35 - Curnow, Edward (0)
34 - Docherty, Sam (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
16 - William, Zac (0)
9 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Sam Walsh has a commanding lead at this point, but the following pack is strong and improving.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #6 – April 25, 2021, 08:55:59 pm

Round 4: Carlton vs Gold Coast:
A win is a win is a win, especially after the way they destroyed Sydney.
Trends:
[1]   The rating this week was 8.42, a little over a C+. That is a little lower than it has been for some of our recent wins, but maybe our expectations have gone up?

[2]   This week we have 4 players who managed 100 votes or more, down from last week. But then, we played better last week.

[3]   This week only one player, Ed Curnow, managed to get votes from all of the voters. There were a couple of others who polled well, but they didn’t convince everybody.

[4]   There were 15 voters this week, down from 17 last week and lower than we manage for most wins. An away game? Maybe.

[5]   This week we had 14 players who managed to get votes, up from 13 last week. Not as good as we were at the end of last year, but decent all the same.

[6]   Ed Curnow managed his first BOG of the year. Sam Walsh had his least effective game for the year and was still 8th for us. Liam Jones backed his marvellous display last week with another strong showing to get 2nd.

Votes:
Curnow, Edward 328
Jones, Liam 244
Weitering, Jacob 216
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 118
Docherty, Sam 73
Murphy, Marc 73
Cripps, Patrick 42
Walsh, Sam 39
Cottrell, Matthew 34
Pittonet, Marc 28
Betts, Eddie 22
Fogarty, Lachlan 11
Gibbons, Michael 11
Newnes, Jack 11
Saad, Adam 8
Plowman, Lachlan 3

Progressive Voting:
1023 - Walsh, Sam (0)
550 - Jones, Liam (0)
547 - Saad, Adam (0)
435 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
424 - McKay, Harrison (0)
385 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
363 - Curnow, Edward (0)
266 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
182 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
141 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
120 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
107 - Docherty, Sam (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
73 - Murphy, Marc (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
37 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
34 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Betts, Eddie (0)
16 - William, Zac (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Walsh has gone out to a 500 lead with another strong performance. Jones is coming 2nd at this point.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #7 – April 25, 2021, 09:41:48 pm

Round 5: Carlton vs Port Adelaide
A very disappointing night, but one where we didn't get flogged.

Trends:
[1]   The rating this week was 5.71, a low rating indeed. That corresponds to a E- and is the lowest rating of the year so far.

[2]   This week we had 2 players get 100 votes or more. We only had a couple of 4 quarter players, and this is the result.

[3]   This week we had only 1 player, Sam Walsh, who managed to get votes from everyone. Jacob Weitering almost made it: 1 voter did not rate his performance.

[4]   There were 14 voters this week, up from 13 for the same round last year and down from last week. Not a great surprise, the way we played.

[5]   13 players managed a mention this week, which isn’t bad, but few of them got more than a few votes. Only 2 players really stood out.

[6]   Sam Walsh managed his 2nd BOG for the year, while Jacob Weitering was runner up. There was a big gap to the rest.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 355
Weitering, Jacob 200
Casboult, Levi 73
Docherty, Sam 53
Cripps, Patrick 41
Pittonet, Marc 41
Saad, Adam 31
Cottrell, Matthew 20
William, Zac 18
Curnow, Edward 12
Fogarty, Lachlan 4
Gibbons, Michael 4
Plowman, Lachlan 4

Progressive Voting:
1378 - Walsh, Sam (0)
585 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
578 - Saad, Adam (0)
550 - Jones, Liam (0)
475 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
424 - McKay, Harrison (0)
376 - Curnow, Edward (0)
270 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
160 - Docherty, Sam (0)
141 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
124 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
77 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
73 - Murphy, Marc (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
55 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
34 - William, Zac (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Betts, Eddie (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Walsh is about 800 ahead at this point and is a long way ahead of the pack.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #8 – May 15, 2021, 11:00:44 am

Round 6: Carlton vs Brisbane
Another one of those games that we could have won, but didn't.

Trends:
[1]   The rating this round was 7.07, which represents a D. It is probably a little low for a team that got so close to a certain finalist, but there is only so much heartache that we can tolerate.

[2]   This round we had 4 players get more than 100 votes, a considerable improvement over the Port Adelaide game.

[3]   This round we had 2 player who got votes from everybody. Two others missed by one or two voters only. Sam Walsh and H were the two that were unanimous, and they deserved their ratings with fine fines. Jones and Ed Curnow were the two that missed by a voter or two.

[4]   We had 14 voters this round, down from 17 for the same round last year, but the same as last week. We won’t get many more until we start winning.

[5]   There were 10 players who got a mention this week. This is very much one of the down-points for this game. We had a lot of players who didn’t make much of an impression for this round. Last week 13 players managed to get a vote in an inglorious display.

[6]   Sam Walsh continued his fantastic season with his 3rd BOG result. He has been BOG in half the matches he plays, something that is Don Bradman-like. H was in the top 3 for the 3rd time this year but hasn’t cracked a BOG yet.

[7]   Our bigger name recruits failed to fire again this week. That has to be a worry for our match committee. It is certainly something I do not like.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 391
McKay, Harrison 275
Curnow, Edward 141
Jones, Liam 134
Cripps, Patrick 48
Weitering, Jacob 40
Pittonet, Marc 18
Murphy, Marc 5
Docherty, Sam 3
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 3
Cuningham, David 3

Progressive Voting:
1770 - Walsh, Sam (0)
699 - McKay, Harrison (0)
684 - Jones, Liam (0)
625 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
578 - Saad, Adam (0)
523 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
517 - Curnow, Edward (0)
270 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
163 - Docherty, Sam (0)
144 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
124 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
95 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
79 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
55 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
34 - William, Zac (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
23 - Betts, Eddie (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
3 - Cuningham, David (0)

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #9 – May 15, 2021, 04:08:54 pm

Round 8: Carlton vs Western Bulldogs:
What might have been, again. We did everything but win the damned game. Sigh!

Trends:
[1]   The rating varied a lot this week. Some voters wanted to penalize the side for capitulating, while others thought we were actually close and played well for most of the game. Everyone has their opinion, one of the strengths of our voting system. The result was 7.46, which represents something between a C- and a D+. Probably a reasonable result, considering that we lost.

[2]   In the view of the voters we had 3 outstanding players who got votes from everyone. There were 2 other that attracted votes from all but a couple.

[3]   We had 5 players getting 100 votes or more. This sort of distribution is more common in wins than in losses.

[4]   11 players rated a mention. This is more like the voting pattern we saw a few years back. Last year more players managed a mention as we were a more even side.

[5]   Jacob Weitering has his first BOG for the season. Eddie Betts was 2nd, with his first top finish for the year. H managed his 4th top 5 finish for the season.

[6]   We had 13 voters this round, one up from the same round last year and one down from last week.

[7]   Again, our big-name recruits did not make much of an impact. A very worrying trend in my opinion.

Votes:
Weitering, Jacob 373
Betts, Eddie 221
McKay, Harrison 164
Docherty, Sam 135
Curnow, Edward 123
Walsh, Sam 43
Plowman, Lachlan 26
Cottrell, Matthew 14
Pittonet, Marc 11
Cuningham, David 6
Owies, Matthew 3

The progressive votes:
1813 - Walsh, Sam (0)
999 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
863 - McKay, Harrison (0)
684 - Jones, Liam (0)
640 - Curnow, Edward (0)
578 - Saad, Adam (0)
523 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
298 - Docherty, Sam (0)
270 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
244 - Betts, Eddie (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
149 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
144 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
107 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
79 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
34 - William, Zac (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
9 - Cuningham, David (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
3 - Owies, Matthew (0)

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #10 – May 16, 2021, 10:16:59 am

I seem to have missed a game somewhere. Got to fix that up.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #11 – May 22, 2021, 12:08:42 pm

I forgot to input the Essendon game. I'll do that later today.
Suffice to say that Walsh was BOG.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #12 – May 27, 2021, 09:21:36 pm

Carlton vs Drug Cheats: a nice win.
Trends:
[1]   The rating of 8.94, which is effectively a B, is the 2nd highest for the year. I’m not quite sure what that says, except that we haven’t been as good as we had hoped.

[2]   We had 17 Voters for this game.

[3]   We had 14 players worthy of a mention this round. This is the sort of number we were getting when we were winning games last year. In 2020 we were a very even side. That had a lot of potential in it, as we didn’t depend on a small number of players.

[4]   We had 6 players who managed to get 100 votes or better. This is the best spread of top votes I can remember.

[5]   Sam Walsh was the stand-out player, yet again. His form this year has been nothing short of brilliant.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 452
Curnow, Edward 210
Saad, Adam 184
Weitering, Jacob 163
Cuningham, David 105
McKay, Harrison 100
Betts, Eddie 53
Owies, Matthew 45
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 13
Fogarty, Lachlan 5
Cripps, Patrick 3
Docherty, Sam 3
Pittonet, Marc 3
Cottrell, Matthew 3

Progressive Voting:
2265 - Walsh, Sam (0)
1162 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
963 - McKay, Harrison (0)
851 - Curnow, Edward (0)
762 - Saad, Adam (0)
684 - Jones, Liam (0)
526 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
301 - Docherty, Sam (0)
297 - Betts, Eddie (0)
275 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
149 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
114 - Cuningham, David (0)
109 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
79 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
72 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
48 - Owies, Matthew (0)
34 - William, Zac (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Sam Walsh has a massive 1100 vote lead at this point.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #13 – May 28, 2021, 10:20:42 pm

Rd 9: Carlton vs Melbourne
I was disappointed at the time, but our result looks pretty good now. Melbourne are good this year.

Trends:
[1]   The rating for this game was 7.51, just a little less than a C-. At the time I was very disappointed, and not a little angry, but our result holds up very well. Only Adelaide (!!!) have done better.

[2]   This round we had 4 players get 100 or more votes. That is pretty good for a loss, but again appeared to be pretty even.

[3]   We had 3 players who got votes from every voter, with another two that missed from 2 voters.

[4]   We had 13 voters this round. Not far off normal for a loss and 3 better than for the same round last year.

[5]   Sam Walsh managed his 5th BOG for the year. Docherty had his best result of the year (2nd). In fact, 9 out of the top 10 vote getters were our top vote getters this week.

[6]   There were 16 players who got a mention, something we usually only get for a win.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 292
Docherty, Sam 202
Cripps, Patrick 147
Curnow, Edward 133
McKay, Harrison 87
Saad, Adam 78
Betts, Eddie 58
Jones, Liam 43
Cottrell, Matthew 29
Fogarty, Lachlan 14
Stocker, Liam 12
Weitering, Jacob 9
Newman, Nicholas 9
William, Zac 6
Setterfield, Will 6
Murphy, Marc 3

Progressive Voting:
2557 - Walsh, Sam (0)
1170 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
1049 - McKay, Harrison (0)
984 - Curnow, Edward (0)
840 - Saad, Adam (0)
727 - Jones, Liam (0)
673 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
503 - Docherty, Sam (0)
354 - Betts, Eddie (0)
290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
149 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
114 - Cuningham, David (0)
109 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
100 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
81 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
73 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
48 - Owies, Matthew (0)
40 - William, Zac (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
12 - Stocker, Liam (0)
9 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)
6 - Setterfield, Will (0)

Sam Walsh is almost 1400 votes ahead at this point. Those numbers are Judd-like.

Re: Jim Park Analysis 2021

Reply #14 – June 05, 2021, 02:40:33 pm

Carlton vs Hawthorn at the MCG.
The first time we've beaten them at the MCG in a long time. However, we were not convincing.

Trends:
[1] This week there was a distinct scarcity of voters. Normally for a win there are about ]17 voters. Normally for a loss, there are about 12. This was a significant win, but only 14 people bothered to vote. This is not the signs that we would like to see at all. Unfortunately, it was a measure of how underwhelming the game actually was.

[2] The rating was 8.62. almost a B-. We have performed that well this year in losses.

[3] One very positive trend on the day was that 4 players managed 100 or more votes this week. A very positive effort.

[4] Similarly, 17 players managed a mention. Both of those tend to occur only when we play particularly well.

[5] Walsh managed yet another BOG performance. For the 5th time this season.

[6] There were 3 players who got votes from every voter, with another two that were close to that.

Votes:
Walsh, Sam 363
Docherty, Sam 228
Curnow, Edward 191
Saad, Adam 129
Weitering, Jacob 74
William, Zac 68
Betts, Eddie 55
Cripps, Patrick 46
Silvagni, Jack 35
Pittonet, Marc 31
Stocker, Liam 18
Murphy, Marc 9
Newman, Nicholas 9
Jones, Liam 6
Plowman, Lachlan 6
Owies, Matthew 6
Cottrell, Matthew 3

Progressive Votes:
2920 - Walsh, Sam (0)
1244 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
1175 - Curnow, Edward (0)
1049 - McKay, Harrison (0)
969 - Saad, Adam (0)
733 - Jones, Liam (0)
731 - Docherty, Sam (0)
720 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
410 - Betts, Eddie (0)
290 - Fogarty, Lachlan (0)
186 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
157 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
156 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
140 - Pittonet, Marc (0)
114 - Cuningham, David (0)
110 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
108 - William, Zac (0)
104 - Cottrell, Matthew (0)
100 - Murphy, Marc (0)
78 - Newnes, Jack (0)
74 - Casboult, Levi (0)
69 - Martin, Jack (0)
54 - Owies, Matthew (0)
34 - Stocker, Liam (0)
26 - Fisher, Zac (0)
18 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
8 - McDonald, Oscar (0)

Walsh had a 1600 lead.