Re: France recalls their ambassadors
Reply #23 –
Julia Gillard got into hot water for calling Pyne a mincing poodle
As I understand the submarines contract between us and the French, there were several milestones at which the contract could be terminated if there were issues with progress/delivery. Of course, termination, even if justified, brings about a penalty payment and we're going to ante up. France clearly knew that the cost overruns and timeline blowouts had placed the contract in jeopardy. Indeed, a French Parliamentarian raised the matter a month or two ago.
The problem with the subs contract, and most other defence purchases, is that we often go for untested technology like the F-35A Lightning, or ask for modifications that compromise functionality. The overweight weapons system on the Army's Boxer Combat Reconnaissance Vehicles is an example of the latter. The French subs may have taken decades to commission and may never have been fit for service.
Buying submarines 'off the the shelf' is a much smarter and more efficient way to go, particularly if we go for the cheaper, smaller UK Astute Class subs. However, the problem with acquiring nuclear subs is that we will struggle to get and maintain the numbers of highly trained submariners required. Our Collins Class subs are often inactive not because they're unreliable but because we can't get enough matelots to crew them.