Re: Docherty standing down
Reply #37 –
I see it pretty much the same way Thry. Teague's appointment was populist and the easy way out. The club then failed to give him the resources and support that he desperately needed (although I think Teague foolishly maintained that he didn't need support). I wasn't happy with the way Teague's departure was mishandled but terminating his contract was really the only option if we're to be successful.
As for Cripps, he certainly wasn't silent when it came to Teague, and there were some unfortunate contributions about Cripps from the Teague camp. For example:
Then there's Crippa's defence of Teague:
And Teague's crack at Cripps when the latter was subbed out:
And Crippa's response:
Crippa isn't mentioned among the players who allegedly called for Teague to be retained but, at least some reporters concede that they didn't know his private position regarding Teague. I suspect that Cripps knows enough about footy to realise that another season with Teague as coach would have meant another season in the doldrums. Giving that feedback to the review would, in my opinion, be entirely appropriate for the skipper and any senior player. Loyalty is an important attribute but loyalty to the club, the playing group and the supporters is more important than loyalty to an individual who was holding the club back.