Skip to main content

Poll

Who is the best 5 bench players to go with the existing lineup below?

*** currently vacant
*****Backline group*****2 - Lachie Cowan
3 - Jesse Motlop
4 - Oliver Hollands
*****Midfield group*****5 - Adam Cerra
*****Forwards group*****6 - Zac Williams
*****Midfield group*****7 - Jagga Smith
8 - Lachie Fogarty
*****Midfield group*****9 - Patrick Cripps
*****Forwards group*****10 - Harry McKay
11 - Mitch McGovern
*****Forwards group*****12 - Ben Ainsworth
13 - Blake Acres
14 - Ollie Florent
15 - Billy Wilson
16 - Ben Camporeale
*****Forwards group*****17 - Brodie Kemp
*****Midfield group*****18 - Sam Walsh
*****Forwards group*****19 - Will Hayward
***20 - Elijah Hollands - currently not on our list
21 - Lucas Camporeale
*****Backline group*****22 - Harry O'Farrell
*****Backline group*****23 - Jacob Weitering
*****Backline group*****24 - Nick Newman
25 - Liam Reidy
*****Backline group*****26 - Nick Haynes
*****Midfield group*****27 - Marc Pittonet
28 - Harry Charleson
*****Midfield group*****29 - George Hewitt
30 - Jack Ison
31 - Campbell Chesser
32 - Matthew Carroll
33 - Lewis Young
34 - Rob Monahan
35 - Harry Dean
36 - Cooper Lord
37 - Jordan Boyd
***38 - Will White - currently not on our list
39 - Talor Byrne
40 - Hudson O'Keeffe
41 - Matt Duffy
*****Backline group*****42 - Adam Saad
*****Forwards group*****43 - Ashton Moir
44 - Francis Evans
45 - Flynn Young
46 - Matt Cottrell
Topic: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench (Read 8478 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench

Reply #105
^^ it was his first time in 7 years.  Not sure we ditched him or he moved on for greater opportunities as the inside mid spot is very much occupied.

Like one swallow not making a summer, lets see how he gets on again moving forward at the Doggies.  Kennedy is a fine player, but he isnt a needle mover on his own.
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench

Reply #106
Having only six players who played all games was a significant factor in our season.

However, what I want to know is why the best and most irreplaceable CHB we’ve had wasn’t rated? 😇

Because that was from pre-season, he hadn't played a game there.
Do you want me to find one from the middle of the year??

And that's why the 'paper' team we've currently picked means 'diddly squat'.
We're going to find later in the year that players who are currently not in the paper side will have cemented spots...some through a change of position or role.

Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench

Reply #107
^^ it was his first time in 7 years.  Not sure we ditched him or he moved on for greater opportunities as the inside mid spot is very much occupied.

Like one swallow not making a summer, lets see how he gets on again moving forward at the Doggies.  Kennedy is a fine player, but he isnt a needle mover on his own.

No i get that, i'm just pointing out 2 things.

1. If its all about players that play every game, we stuffed up last year.
2. If its more about the quality of players playing, then players playing every game is somewhat irrelevent, as long as the players playing are better than players previous.  eg Fogarty, good on him, he played 20 games. Not 1 person picked him as a starting 6.
Only 1 person gave him a spot on the bench, 1.
So does it matter how many games he played or does it matter that he is no good?!
Same with Motlop, played every game, he just got a gig as an emergency in our team this year though.

 

Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench

Reply #108


Because that was from pre-season, he hadn't played a game there.
Do you want me to find one from the middle of the year??

And that's why the 'paper' team we've currently picked means 'diddly squat'.
We're going to find later in the year that players who are currently not in the paper side will have cemented spots...some through a change of position or role.

Well if we don't have paper teams at this time of the year we may as well shut the site down  :P

Its all speculation.

We don't even know who Vossys favourites are yet ;)

Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench

Reply #109


And that's why the 'paper' team we've currently picked means 'diddly squat'.
We're going to find later in the year that players who are currently not in the paper side will have cemented spots...some through a change of position or role.

Well if we don't have paper teams at this time of the year we may as well shut the site down  :P

Its all speculation.

We don't even know who Vossys favourites are yet ;)

By all means discuss it
It was a fun exercise.
Just don't give it any weight.

With regard to players playing every game.
Individually it  may not be important but the more players who play together, the more often, the better it is for team dynamics.
They develop an understanding and cohesion.
They gain an understanding of their teammates strengths and weaknsess under pressure that training cannot reproduce.
If half the side are missing half the year, playing injured or have their minds elsewhere it's not conducive to good team development.





Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench

Reply #110


Well if we don't have paper teams at this time of the year we may as well shut the site down  :P

Its all speculation.

We don't even know who Vossys favourites are yet ;)

By all means discuss it
It was a fun exercise.
Just don't give it any weight.

With regard to players playing every game.
Individually it  may not be important but the more players who play together, the more often, the better it is for team dynamics.
They develop an understanding and cohesion.
They gain an understanding of their teammates strengths and weaknsess under pressure that training cannot reproduce.
If half the side are missing half the year, playing injured or have their minds elsewhere it's not conducive to good team development.

I get that, and its also 1 reason why i prefer to 'grow my own' KPPs. Better for team development rather than imported one later. ;)