Re: R1 Carlton vs Power After-match Aftermath
Reply #158 –
He looked a good ruckmen until we tried to turn him into a forward, in much the same way Casboult looked a good ruck / forward after five games in the TAC as a forward and failed to progress as a forward. Kreuzer is still a good player, but I doubt he will ever be a good forward.
People know where I stand on this, we kept a bunch of spud forwards and in the process b0rked up what was potentially the leagues best ruck division. We took a strength and turned it into a weakness and failed to address a clear weakness. Poster keel-hauled Brett Ratten for trying to turn SpecialK into a forward, and now Mick Malthouse is doing exactly the same thing and posters seem to accept it.
Why does MM doing this get justified as the right move but when Ratten did it they labeled the same process so wrong?
In the end nothing has changed for the better it seems!