Skip to main content
Topic: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead  (Read 91456 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #180
@CIMM

Kreuz wasn't chasing mate he was hobbling I promise you.

Cas kicked 3 goals in the last 40 mins of our game vs Richmond a few weeks ago including two strong marks in the goalsquare. The comments re him running out of steam are a myth trust me. The Hawks game earlier in the year he was simply outplayed in the second half by a smarter B. Lake. Granted that's just one example.

Not a myth.

He struggles to run out second halves.

Krooz may have been hobbling but he was still getting back to help in defence late in the game.

Cas is the man up forward and he'll play just hope he can be good late.

Meat has never had the primo endurance that a bloke like Cloke or Reiwoldt has, yet he has been playing the wing / high forward / HBF marking role and it kills him off. Inmy opinion he needs to staying inside F50 to act as a target for the Amigos to rove to, we do not even need him to mark it every time, we just need him to make sure he is not out marked.

My biggest criticism of Meat in recent times is when you see him out bodied by opposition mediums late in games. He fails to contest marks and the defenders take the ball away too easily, a guy his size should not be out muscled by a 185cm~190cm types ever! FWIW, I have had the same criticism of 206, but 206s last 5~6 quarters have been 1000% better.

In terms of body on body I think our tall players rank like this, until 5~6 quarters ago!;
Kreuzer
Hampson
Rowe
Casboult
Warnock

Now after just 5~6 quarters I think it is more like this;
Kreuzer
Hampson
Warnock
Rowe
Casboult

Warnock is the big improver.
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #181
@CIMM

I say it's a myth mate. Ran out the game against Richmond OK. At the ground on Sunday Kreuzer couldn't even chase. One defensive punch over the line doesn't equate to really getting back to help out IMO. Add to that he struggles to take a mark even when fit Cas is a better shot at having an impact. Plus I wouldn't call 7 possies in 2 games worthwhile output regardless of ruckwork. IMO.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #182
@LP

Kreuzer's biggest weakness is body on body in marking contests. If he gets a clear run at it he's a good chance, body on body he struggles to even get his hands on the ball.

FTR 2013:

Kreuzer 17 games 22 contested marks

Meat 10 games 25 contested marks.

That doesn't entirely reflect body on body but gives a decent enough comparison. The two don't compare. Hate to harp on about the Richmond game but Kreuzer wouldn't even have come close to taking those marks Cas took in the second half.

If our rucks (Kreuzer/Warnock) had the ability to even get their hands on the ball in marking contests Meat would be able to stay inside 50. Unfortunately that's not the case.
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #183
@LP

Kreuzer's biggest weakness is body on body in marking contests. If he gets a clear run at it he's a good chance, body on body he struggles to even get his hands on the ball.

FTR 2013:

Kreuzer 17 games 22 contested marks

Meat 10 games 25 contested marks.

That doesn't entirely reflect body on body but gives a decent enough comparison. The two don't compare. Hate to harp on about the Richmond game but Kreuzer wouldn't even have come close to taking those marks Cas took in the second half.

If our rucks (Kreuzer/Warnock) had the ability to even get their hands on the ball in marking contests Meat would be able to stay inside 50. Unfortunately that's not the case.

No you have that back to front, you are associating marking stats with contesting which is irrelevant and not what I was talking about. As I mentioned marking the ball is not the critical stat especially if lots of those marks come out on the wing or HBF. A defender marking deep in the 50 is far more damaging to the opponent than a forward marking on the wing!

Kreuzer and Hampson are very rarely out marked anywhere on the ground including inside F50, in fact last weekend was one of the few occasions someone marked against Kreuzer inside 50 in a contest. Even then that was debatable but umpires must pay the man in front. But it got every bodies attention because it rarely happens.

For the bulk of contests Kreuzer and Hampson always at least bring the ball to ground, they both do not clunk anywhere near enough but that is not what I was referring to.

The other three regularly have opponents out marking them or they fail altogether to stay in the contest. When Kreuzer and Hampson enter a contest they rarely fail to at least get a hand on the ball, the others seem to fail regularly!
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #184
Nah I disagree, Kreuzer does not bring the ball to ground at all, like I said, he fails to even get his hands on the ball. Pull out any game from this year to figure that out. The only time he got his hands to the ball in a contested situation last week was when he went to mark inside defensive 50m and really should've punched anway. Meat's contested marks alone dismiss your opinions re never getting to the contest and show he is clearly ahead of Kreuz in this area no matter what spin you put on it.

This is going nowhere, let's put it in the agree to disagree bucket and focus on the game. ;)
Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #185
Nah I disagree, Kreuzer does not bring the ball to ground at all, like I said, he fails to even get his hands on the ball. Pull out any game from this year to figure that out. This is going nowhere, let's put it in the agree to disagree bucket and focus on the game. ;)

I have no idea what games you are watching or what you think a contest is but it isn't marking on a lead on the wing!
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #186
Nah I disagree, Kreuzer does not bring the ball to ground at all, like I said, he fails to even get his hands on the ball. Pull out any game from this year to figure that out. This is going nowhere, let's put it in the agree to disagree bucket and focus on the game. ;)

I have no idea what games you are watching or what you think a contest is but it isn't marking on a lead on the wing!


OK one more comment.
 
I would call a long kickout from a behind to a contest on the HBF outside 50 a contested situation. Kreuzer time and time fails to impact these contests (as does Warnock).

Ignorance is bliss.

ONWARDS AND UPWARDS!

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #187
Nah I disagree, Kreuzer does not bring the ball to ground at all, like I said, he fails to even get his hands on the ball. Pull out any game from this year to figure that out. This is going nowhere, let's put it in the agree to disagree bucket and focus on the game. ;)

I have no idea what games you are watching or what you think a contest is but it isn't marking on a lead on the wing!


OK one more comment.
 
I would call a long kickout from a behind to a contest on the HBF outside 50 a contested situation. Kreuzer time and time fails to impact these contests (as does Warnock).

That situation depends more on the decisions of the kicker than the target, and I suspect if I was at FB and wanted a mark on D50 I would also chose Casboult over the others because he does clunk them more frequently than the others. Those marks help our defense not our forward line, and Kreuzer and Hampson bringing the ball to ground is not a plus inside our D50. But that event has no direct connection or correlation to having our 200cm players out marked and out bodied by defenders inside our F50.

As I have said before, if a defender was standing a 200cm bloke I am sure he would be happy for him to clunk marks on the wing or HBF because it is the better option to having them contested inside the 50!

It is not rocket science PI2C, and I suspect if Meat is prepared to run up the wing for a mark someone in the Sydney defense will happily let him!

People bag Kreuzer and Hampson, but when we get the ball on the HBF either of those two will sprint back to F50 making every attempt to clunk a mark or make a contest. Meat jogs back behind the ball watching it leave his zone! In my opinion that leaves him either unfit, lazy or both!
"Extremists on either side will always meet in the Middle!"

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #188
Quote
Meat has never had the primo endurance that a bloke like Cloke or Reiwoldt has, yet he has been playing the wing / high forward / HBF marking role and it kills him off. Inmy opinion he needs to staying inside F50 to act as a target for the Amigos to rove to, we do not even need him to mark it every time, we just need him to make sure he is not out marked.

Spot on.  Waite plays the lead up role, the Bolt lurks around the goal front.
Finals, then 4 in a row!

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #189
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/blues-answer-some-questions-but-final-exam-just-got-tougher-20130913-2tpdl.html

Quote
For Carlton, what an incredible difference a week makes. Or does it? Duigan has effectively been on the outer for the entire year and only got a late reprieve after Brock McLean’s last-minute withdrawal. Will one good final ensure his future, having been overlooked on 20 other occasions this year? Did Eddie Betts’ industrious, three-goal performance encourage those in charge of re-contracting him to revisit their initial offer?

Have we come any closer to unravelling the enigma that is Jarrad Waite, who once again gave every indication that he could be one of the very best forwards in the competition? The answer to that question ultimately lies with Waite, and the injury gods who have denied him a consistent run at it for most of his career. You get the feeling that the Blues will not deviate from their search for a big key forward, despite managing 18 goals on the weekend.

While those questions remain unanswered, there were definitive answers elsewhere for the Blues, courtesy of their fortuitous foray into September.

Any doubts that Chris Judd’s match-winning ability had passed him by were put to bed. Bryce Gibbs played the sort of game, on the back of the sort of month of football, that is far more in keeping with his ability, and that will elevate his standing in the game.

Marc Murphy has influenced the result of  critical games in the past few weeks, and with a big pre-season under his belt will justify his elevation to captain.

Mitch Robinson showed the mental strength, to complement his physical strength, by putting a brain-fade behind him and playing a magnificent, game-defining last quarter. Dare I say it, it was a mature statement from him.  :o

Tom Bell demonstrated that he is a player of September standard, Ed Curnow can assume Ryan Crowley type of importance to the Blues and Kade Simpson deserves the recognition that is finally coming his way.

Yes, there were some pleasing answers to season-long questions for the Blues. But there has been no better team to ask the questions, in recent years, than the Swans. The exam just got a whole lot harder.


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/blues-answer-some-questions-but-final-exam-just-got-tougher-20130913-2tpdl.html#ixzz2ekQ8UqcY
Finals, then 4 in a row!

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #190
Quote
Meat has never had the primo endurance that a bloke like Cloke or Reiwoldt has, yet he has been playing the wing / high forward / HBF marking role and it kills him off. Inmy opinion he needs to staying inside F50 to act as a target for the Amigos to rove to, we do not even need him to mark it every time, we just need him to make sure he is not out marked.

Spot on.  Waite plays the lead up role, the Bolt lurks around the goal front.

And ruck.

His ruck role is as important and you can't do that lurking in the goal square.
You can fool some of the people some of the time.......................................

 

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #191
Quote
Meat has never had the primo endurance that a bloke like Cloke or Reiwoldt has, yet he has been playing the wing / high forward / HBF marking role and it kills him off. Inmy opinion he needs to staying inside F50 to act as a target for the Amigos to rove to, we do not even need him to mark it every time, we just need him to make sure he is not out marked.

Spot on.  Waite plays the lead up role, the Bolt lurks around the goal front.

And ruck.

His ruck role is as important and you can't do that lurking in the goal square.

Yep and ruck.

Perhaps not a n A grade ruck but not undersized.
Finals, then 4 in a row!

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #192
Thinking about the team and in particular the sub.  I hate to say it but Yarran is actually the best suited for this game (I'm assuming that Menzel makes way for McLean otherwise it will be Menzel).

I'd prefer the harder bodies in the early stages and then really hit them with run after half time.
Excuses year 1, blame year 2, contract extention year 3........

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #193
As an out of the Box idea, what about Judd as the sub?

I have a feeling that both Rowe and Casboult might play and Waite might not get up for this one...
"everything you know is wrong"

Paul Hewson

Re: Blues v Swans semi final - pre game thead

Reply #194
Oh dear... just realised that this is Simmo's 200th and we know what we do in milstone games! :( Damn.

Only our ruthless best, from Board to bootstudders will get us no. 17