Re: Track and Field Reply #105 – April 14, 2025, 11:29:23 am Quote from: Lods – on April 14, 2025, 09:29:04 amI'm not sure the point you're trying to make is Thry.If you have a look at our National Track and Field records there are many that date back to the early 2000s, 1990's and even 1980s. (Darren Clark 400m, Ken Lorraway Triple Jump, Debbie Flintoff 400H)Boyle's former under 20 100metre record was set at altitude (Mexico), so breaking it was long overdue.Advances in training methods (loading, periodization, nutrition et) in most sports mean we are producing bigger, stronger, fitter athletes.Its probably more apparent in a sport like AFL.If our current team, even missing a few, went up against one of our premiership teams from the seventies or eighties it would be a slaughter.The current side would run them ragged and hit them with a pressure game they couldn't withstand.I just responded to kruddler (in agreement with the chinese swim team point), and then there was an attempt to correct me based on flaky stuff.Sure, training techniques and all that. There is a limit to that stuff though.We should likely have plateued 10 years ago, but without fail, countries seem to find a generation of young and upcoming stars in all disciplines, just in time to host a major event (which puts more local bums on seats).It could be that funding is better leading into hosting an event, it could be a coincidence, or it could simply be that there is an element of PED use (could be legal or not) and we wont know those answers for sure.A few other points have tried to discredit, but I suspect that the conditions on the day are more conducive to the historic records standing than other things. Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #106 – April 14, 2025, 12:47:44 pm I think we're still well off the limits of what men and women can achieve.In some track and field events improved technology plays a part.The poles that vaulters use in the pole vault (fibreglass and carbon fibre) give a great more advantage than the bamboo amd metal poles of the past.Nutrition and sports medicine are improving all the time.I don't think the funding for the games in Brisbane would be impacting this far out.And PED use is not the factor it was in the days of the Eastern Bloc and select Western nations (and even a few Australians ) in the 1970s and 1980s.There are some records on the World list that shouldn't be there due to PED use, but at the time they got through.Marita Koch (400m) holds the world record with 47.60 set in Canberra in 1985We rate Cathy Freemans run in the Sydney Olympics (we hope and believe it was clean) but she was more than a second behind Koch's time which has never been beaten.Women's Long Jump, Discus, Shot, Heptathlon world records were all set in the 1980'sAnd then there was Flo Jo in the 100 and 200, 1988 records that still elude some fantastic runners.Men are a little better, but there are still plenty of records set in the 1990s that still stand.You can never say for certain, and if someone popped up positive at the moment it wouldn't be a huge surprise, but widespread and systematic use, probably not. I really do doubt what we're seeing is performance enhanced, especially with the teenage athletes. Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #107 – April 14, 2025, 01:05:20 pm Just in terms of technology. I've heard that they had to 'handicap' the javelin because with technology people would be outthrowing the field to the point it would hit the track, so they weighted them down. Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #108 – April 14, 2025, 01:32:02 pm Quote from: kruddler – on April 14, 2025, 01:05:20 pmJust in terms of technology. I've heard that they had to 'handicap' the javelin because with technology people would be outthrowing the field to the point it would hit the track, so they weighted them down.Yep When Uwe Hohn set the World record in 1984 he threw 104.8 metres.There was a danger of it hitting someone at the other end of the stadium.At the same time there was increasing issues with many throws being called foul because the tip hadn't landed first.It's always been a bit of an issue and even to trained officials it was sometimes hard to judge.What they did was make some alterations to the centre of balance, so the Javelin (heavier now in the forward half) came over more quickly resulting in shorter distances, and landing point first more often.New records were established with the new specs, and old Javelins could no longer be used.It was very annoying at the time. I suddenly had four obsolete Javelins. Quote Selected 2 Likes
Re: Track and Field Reply #109 – April 16, 2025, 05:04:21 pm Wind doping https://www.news.com.au/sport/olympics/matt-denny-at-centre-of-wind-doping-claim-after-setting-oceania-discus-record/news-story/4167b44648435d6ec7f34a286b00e3bc?utm_campaign=EditorialSB&utm_source=news.com.au%20Sport&utm_medium=Facebook&utm_content=SocialBakersGood luck trying to regulate that one... Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #110 – April 16, 2025, 05:06:09 pm Quote from: Lods – on April 16, 2025, 05:04:21 pmWind doping https://www.news.com.au/sport/olympics/matt-denny-at-centre-of-wind-doping-claim-after-setting-oceania-discus-record/news-story/4167b44648435d6ec7f34a286b00e3bc?utm_campaign=EditorialSB&utm_source=news.com.au%20Sport&utm_medium=Facebook&utm_content=SocialBakersGood luck trying to regulate that one... Does that start with a All Inclusive Unlimited Buffet at the local Curry Shop? Quote Selected 1 Likes
Re: Track and Field Reply #111 – April 19, 2025, 03:27:54 pm Kennedy and Gout both win their heats at Stawell.Kennedy looked much smoother in his race, although once Gout hit his stride he looked goodThe handicap nature of the event means both aren't assured of even making the finals.There's only a matter of tenths between most of the heat winners, but times are pretty irrelevant as efforts varied with each race as did the assisting windsThe fastest qualifier with a 12.13 was John Evans, who started from 9.75mHe might be worth a shilling bet.Jack Hale was also impressive in his heat.Semis will give us a better idea on Monday. Quote Selected Last Edit: April 19, 2025, 03:41:29 pm by Lods 1 Likes
Re: Track and Field Reply #112 – April 21, 2025, 09:35:15 am Check this out......OMG Quote Selected 1 Likes
Re: Track and Field Reply #113 – April 21, 2025, 09:47:12 am Quote from: tonyo – on April 21, 2025, 09:35:15 amCheck this out......OMG Insane! Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #115 – April 21, 2025, 12:10:03 pm Quote from: Slowhand – on April 21, 2025, 10:05:58 amSign him up Too fast for our side. Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #116 – April 21, 2025, 01:21:54 pm Gout, Kennedy and Hale all miss the finalCouldn't quite beat the handicaps(The weather was pretty crap too with some heavy showers around semi time.)I'll be hoping for Mitch O'Neill who is a member of my old club in the final. Quote Selected Last Edit: April 21, 2025, 01:32:05 pm by Lods
Re: Track and Field Reply #117 – April 21, 2025, 01:51:03 pm Bree (Masters) Rizzo wins the womens gift off scratch Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #118 – April 21, 2025, 02:26:05 pm John Evans wins the gift. Quote Selected
Re: Track and Field Reply #119 – April 21, 2025, 02:54:59 pm Quote from: tonyo – on April 21, 2025, 09:35:15 amCheck this out......OMG Gout Gout needed to ease up to reduce his handicap in the semis...but great vision - looks like an 80s computer game. Quote Selected