1
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Jim Park Voting 2025 AFL Rd 17 Carlton vs Collingwood
5 - Cripps
4 - Hollands, O
3 - Williams (on track for 5 votes at 3/4 time)
2 - Hewett
1 - Cowan
This section allows you to view all Show Posts made by this member. Note that you can only see Show Posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The idea that someone like Saad can make it through a whole AFL career and still be effectively a unilateral ball user is a condemnation on our club and the AFL system in general. It's a fundamental high level skill that is almost completely absent in our list.
Spot on LP!
Our AFL and VFL teams play the same gamestyle ... or attempt to play the same gamestyle. Depending on the opposition, the VFL team often executes it quite well, as does the AFL team in patches, because it's much harder to execute against quality AFL teams.
If Cowan and/or Carroll get promoted to the AFL, they'll be flat out trying to negate their opponent and supporting their teammates. They may get the odd opportunity to break the lines and it may come back to bite them on the butt if there's a poor delivery or a fumble in our forward 50.
Thats all good in a perfect world.
Try telling Pittonet to play like TDK.
Try telling Lemmey to play like Charlie.
Try telling Ben Camporeale to play like Cripps.
Good luck
Port melbourne 2 weeks in a row?
I think it's easy to confuse a perceived difference in tactic with an inability to implement a tactic. Structurally I can't see any real difference between the AFL and VFL game tactics from last weekend, but the tactics are significantly easier to implement against Port Melbourne in the VFL than they are against even a weaker AFL opponent. We can do it in the AFL, but not for 4-qtrs.
Anyone watching Evans and Durdin struggle in the AFL should be acutely aware of that.
Could Cowan and Carroll do in the AFL what they did in the VFL for 4-qtrs, possibly, but most likely only partially, certainly it would be to a lesser extent. Without Cowan and Carroll breaking lines and hitting those targets forward of the contest, Evans, Durdin and Camporeale would find themselves in heavy traffic and the outcome would be very different, they would lose effectiveness. That surely seems familiar.
If it was as easy as moving into the AFL and repeating the VFL procedure everybody would be doing it!
Fair enough, cant understand how Acres keeps getting a game TBH.
Because he is one of our best and most consistent players?!
Against North....
2nd most pressure acts (28)
3rd most meters gained (356)
=2nd most score involvements (6)
=1st marks inside 50 (3)
=1st contested marks (2)
=1st tackles inside 50 (2)
=4th most inside 50's (4)
5th most possessions (21)
4th most contested possessions (9)
=4th most marks (7)
=8th tackles (3)
=7th clearances (2)
=2nd most shots on goal (1.2)
What more do you want from him?
Between the two of them they should be able to wear Xerri down?
Lucky Cincotta is not making salami as well this weekend !
Agree with DJ....Id have Cincotta on Curtis but I think the plan will be cut off the supply and that would be LDU being the most prominent of the Nth mids. Im not a fan of the Pittonet selection, when TDK is not rucking we tend to lose momentum and I cant see Pittonet being picked to play 5 mins a quarter as relief ruck, we need TDK as that defacto midfielder exploiting a meathead like Xerri for as long as possible imo.
North are going in quite tall. Particularly in defense.
Wonder if they are going to screw themselves in a way we normally do.
I dont necessarily like the Haynes match up with Zurhaar, but I suppose we could swap him with JSOS and have Haynes match up with Darling instead. Larkey is Weitering's cryptonite normally so we have a bit of flexibility for match ups down back.
Looking at the lineups, Im not confident they are putting out a side that can beat us. The problem is we have become pretty good at beating ourselves, and any club who takes us seriously could challenge us.
Cinc to Zurhaar?