21
Ladies Lounge / Re: AFLW List Management 2026
Last post by kruddler -Not one person wants out, yet everyone wants in.
Wonder who we will target
Not really, it's on the money, Voss has to achieve more with less and Wright has left him as the fall guy by not extending him causing that extra pressure.
Yes, it's weak article written by someone with scant regard for the facts and minimal analytical ability.
No one is buying that losing TDK, Jack and Charlie has made us better and its all about the optics of Carlton not sacking another coach to make the club looking like it's changed it's ways but it's going to be a mammoth task for Voss to survive.
I don't understand how commentators can declare a coach is under massive pressure, yet those same commentators argue that our list is weaker. Basically saying Voss has to achieve more with less. Top shelf drivel.
Yes, it's weak article written by someone with scant regard for the facts and minimal analytical ability.
So our list management strategy is seeing who wants to come to us and work in with what we have.
....and if nobody wants to come to us??
This is where the draft cuts out the 'want' side of things.
If they end up wanting out, then so be it, but you've got something of value you can trade.
If not, then problem solved.
"What if no-one wants to come to us..."
Seriously?
You do some really good, deep analysis and then you pull out these 'extreme' conclusions.
At the end of the day it's all a guess and personal opinion, embellished with a bit of bias as to how we would do things.
The draft has it's place, but that place loses its importance the deeper into the draft you go.
Recruiting has a lot of elements and there comes a point where one element becomes preferable over another.
Talls are always risky through the draft.
You might draft 4 or 5 for nil result
Yet a look at young players with a couple of years experience and you have a better idea of the player they might be.
I don't understand how commentators can declare a coach is under massive pressure, yet those same commentators argue that our list is weaker. Basically saying Voss has to achieve more with less. Top shelf drivel.
I'm not sure why you are dwelling on the past.
It's gone.
It has no bearing on the present.
We have different people running the show.
I suspect with a bit more of an idea.
But the players you mention there were traded in because most of our premiership side were aging or had retired an we had diddly squat in terms of draft picks due to penalties and trade value....and free agency wasn't a thing then.
Added to that a few of those mentioned were more than serviceable and in a better side would have been valuable.
"What if no-one wants to come to us..."
Seriously?
You do some really good, deep analysis and then you pull out these 'extreme' conclusions.
At the end of the day it's all a guess and personal opinion, embellished with a bit of bias as to how we would do things.
The draft has it's place, but that place loses its importance the deeper into the draft you go.
Recruiting has a lot of elements and there comes a point where one element becomes preferable over another.
Talls are always risky through the draft.
You might draft 4 or 5 for nil result
Yet a look at young players with a couple of years experience and you have a better idea of the player they might be.
Refer to my previous comments. Am i the only one that remembers the previous 2 decades?
2003 trades.....
Heath Scotland
Daniel Harford
Corey McGrath
Brett Johnson
Digby Morrell
David Teague
David Clarke
2004...
Troy Longmiu
Callum Chambers
2005....
Jason Saddington
This is the type of talent we could get our hands on or should i say, the only ones that would come to us.
Why didn't we recruit gun players if it was so easy?
Do i need to show your more years to prove a point??