21
Robert Heatley Stand / Re: Pick our team in parts - Part 4 - 5 on the bench
Last post by Thryleon -most opposition supporters i know thought Charlie was over rated and only scored a lot of goals through favourable free kicks too.
Can I use that along with his decidedly chequered goal scoring history to over ride what I see on game day most weeks too?
We all loved Charlie. His best was amazing. I don't think its reasonable for us to expect a player to replace his best. That won't likely occur.
I also think the optimists remember Charlie's worst which was often on show in the same games as his best and are hoping for someone a bit more reliably consistent even if they are not the match winner Charlie curnow could be (but invariably wasn't more often than not).
When we lost Judd we were all similarly doom and gloom and then a young kid most of us hadn't seen much of flexed his muscles and is on track to becoming one of the best Carlton players we've ever had.
3 AFL clubs (4 if you include Collingwoods cursory interest) wanted Charlie on their list. 2 clubs offered 3x 1st rounders. What you're seeing there is a bit of jealousy and a lot of tall poppy sydnrome.
You see it towards Dangerfield, Daicos, etc They're all 'no good' to opposition supporters, but you wouldn't think that if they wore navy blue. This is what happens with Charlie.
I keep being told to trust the recruiters, well across many teams, they were desperate for Charlie. So why do we NOT trust them in your eyes?
What scenario is ok in your eyes? One where we have a kid to play key forward so we have options? We have options. We played more games missing one of Charlie and Harry than we did with both of them in 2025 (and across the journey that played out a lot) and saw a few players fill the void but not get the win because of key moments where we failed elsewhere. I think back to a game against the bulldogs. Charlie, Lewis young and kemp in the key forwards area. Totalled 11.9 goals on the day. Kemp kicked 5. Charlie 3. Young 2 (should have had more but he passed off a set shot from 45 rather than backing himself) and in remember losing because we lacked run at the end of the game.
Charlie's a gun. I dont need to bag him to feel better about it, but the facts are his best form was in 2022 and 23, with 2024 being good and his 2025 form being a step behind again. Its possible he's on the skids because he's an aging key forward who invariably relies on athleticism to beat his opponents. Also a fine attribute. The criticms are there even in his best years. Remember the coleman he won scoring 19 goals against West Coast across two games? Yeah that was a criticism too.