And on Cripps kicking, anyone who suggests its poor should look at the delivery to SPS who subsequently kicked his first goal of his career. It was Diesel like.
His vision is diesel like. His kicking is not. That doesn't mean he is incapable of good kicks, but it does mean he is more prone to poor ones.
If you were listing his strengths, in order, kicking might be last.
Daisy gets games because of something that he brings every week. 2Nd, 3Rd and 4th efforts.
I know that's not enough for some people but if that rubs off on other players that's fine by me.
I think the problem is, your average punter watches the ball. Makes sense.
However, the best players in the league are the best because of what they do when they don't have the ball. Nick Riewoldt used to cop a lot of flak for his poor kicking. That's what people saw. However, what people ignored was the 200m sprints he did in order to get the ball, lead + back, lead + back, lead again. By the time he got the ball, he had jelly legs and it affected his kicking.
Hard running is underrated by your average punter. It happens to be one of Daisys strengths. There is a reason he gets the 'joe the gooses' over the top.
Was impressed with the endeavor and heart today. Melbourne took till 20 mins into the last to put the game in the bag. Many on here predicted this mob will definitely play finals and made a good outfit look poor last week.
I know it's difficult to be positive when you have a loss but we must remember we had SOJ, C Curnow, Marchbank, SPS, mcCredie and Pickett all in today and curnow aside thought the rest were very serviceable. SOJ is the veteran of this list with 10games!!!
Hard to win with 6 players under 10 games.
Add in Weitering, plowman and cripps as more young players yet to notch 50 games and that's a very young team today.
While I'm disappointed with some of the costly errors from senior players and to lose yet again but I saw enough today to say we are tracking ahead of where I thought we would be.
I'm happy with the kids progress.
A bit of perspective needed folks.
Been preaching that all pre-season.
Reckon all in all, we did ok. We ran out of legs late, but its to be expected with the kids we have.
A few blokes need a rest. Curnowfides needs to recharge his batteries a bit and boost the confidence. I'd give Pickett and SPS at least another week to get better used to the speed of it, then i'd send them back to get a confidence boost as well. Macreadie looks to be coping ok so far.
Amen. I'd go as far to say Daisy would have the opposite effect - players get disgruntled where they see a highly paid dud (and that's certainly what he has become based on onfield performance) delivering little but getting selected week in, week out.
After Daisy took that mark, and found a teammate who converted, how many blokes ran to daisy to congratulate him? Despite it being very deep in the forward pocket, there was at least 10 blokes who made the effort to get to him.
Does that seem like Daisy has players disgruntled at his salary? Seems to me that this was, yet again, a case of 'lets lose our minds over daisy and make things up to suit our arguments'.
DJC sees what I see, and I ain't drinking the "he provides awesome leadership Kool-Aid".
People's tolerance of Daisy's limited output is over, that's why he is the whipping boy. We - and let's face it we all did - expected so much more and we have due to circumstances received a sub-par result. 3 and a bit season of ... what? How many games have you seen where he was clearly in the best three players....
Then, trying to justify the deal with his supposed leadership prowess is, IMHO, verging on self-delusion.
There is a difference between trying to justify the deal, and pointing out that he provides leadership. They are not one and the same.
Who is drinking the kool-aid? The ones who point out reasons why he gets picked each week? The ones who ignore the fact that he is picked every week, thus thinking they know better than the coach and MC, and talk of self delusion?
The simple answer is that Daisy gets picked because he is currently in our best 22
So why does he cop 90% of the criticism when things go wrong?
Murphys handball to daisys feet drew a lot of criticism last week. It resulted in a goal to the opposition. The majority of people blamed daisy. It was clearly Murphys fault for not hitting the target (despite being under some pressure), yet he gets a pardon because of the bloke on the other end. If the handball was to Cripps instead of Daisy, people would then be complaining about Murphy, because Cripps is more loved.
It's inconceivable that we can go into this game unchanged given the insipid effort last week.
Not sure that there's anything to lose by swapping Thomas or White for Kerridge and McKay. Hell, I'd even prefer to see Jaksch ahead of White.
In all honesty, dropping anyone after 1 week is a bit harsh. For all his flaws and lack of motivation, and lack of effort in his game last year it was still harsh to drop Jaksch. He was brought in for 1 game then dropped never to be seen again.
At least everyone gets a 2nd crack at it now. No excuses if they put in another poor performance.
Mate, I know it seems like that, but you do not understand the illness of addiction. Saying he doesn't want to quit drugs is like saying to someone with asthma that they should just take a deep breath to breathe properly. This is the battle of those of us who work in this area, trying to help people understand that mental illness is the same as a physiological illness... just the brain, not lungs, or pancreas, or kidneys...
Addiction is right there with depression, anxiety... bla bla bla. Maybe if I put it this way... when the ticker plays up, we get pain and numbness... when the lungs play up we get shortness of breath, when the intestines play up we get digestive issues... get the gist? Well, the brain is just another organ in our bod, and when it plays up, when it's chemical balance is disrupted, when its synapses are broken, we get... serious behavior / personality issues.
Addiction is an actual illness. It takes over the sufferers brain. He's not making a choice to be a d1ckhead, his illness is controlling his choices, though, there comes a time when the person has to say, 'I want to fight this illness', which means they have to admit they have it... and when it comes to mental illness we all find it hard to admit such a thing due to social stigma. We've a long way to go re social stigma. E.g. got cancer (physical illness)... oh, sh1t you poor bugger... got depression (mental illness), very, very different story (re response).
Look, there is a huge slippery slope we can open up here.
A serial killer probably has a few things wrong with his brain too. Doesn't mean i have any sympathy for him though.
I hear you and get you and understand where you are coming from. But we are coming from SO FAR back that any positive no matter how small we seem to cling to. Our stock of good players is as thick as tissue paper so if a player can pull some boots on, take marks and kick goals then he is a legend. Other teams are able to pick up some knob at pick 45 and he turns out as a first 22, built like a brick st house and a 100 game match winner, I mean WTF. We pick up a top 10 player and he plays 15 games and ALWAYS looks like a string bean and couldn't hit the side of a barn door with a bag full of wheat. Our playing list is so full of weakness and weak spots it is not funny. SO MANY good picks stuffed up (no F**KING STUFFED UP) by incompetence. The club we all love wants success but knows F**K all about how to get it. Why do other clubs get it and we don't? Bolton has brought cohesion and that is all at the moment and with our thin list that is about as much as we can expect. I understand we are on the road of a rebuild and want it and expect it and support it BUT who ever is left wearing that beautiful Navy Blue Guernsey I EXPECT them as an unconditional requirement they wear it with pride and play with INTENSITY and PASSION AND leave NOTHING on the field. NOT go through the motion and collect their pay cheque.
I agree with you about the club as a whole.
In regards to the Casboult part of it, in short, we know what we are going to get from him and it is well below average when compared to his peers.
It's like when we were playing Setanta. He was full of energy, tried his guts out and was a good athlete. However, he simply didn't have footy smarts and/or ability to pick up the nuances of the game. From where he came from, he did a superb effort. Which brings me to this...
Pick 44 in the Rookie Draft....I reckon Casboult's exceeded expectations Simon White..same... 56 in the same rookie draft.
Once you are on the list, it doesn't matter where you were taken and if you exceeded expectations, or failed to live up to them. It matters what you can do out on the footy field.